2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Processing in Social Insect Networks

Abstract: Investigating local-scale interactions within a network makes it possible to test hypotheses about the mechanisms of global network connectivity and to ask whether there are general rules underlying network function across systems. Here we use motif analysis to determine whether the interactions within social insect colonies resemble the patterns exhibited by other animal associations or if they exhibit characteristics of biological regulatory systems. Colonies exhibit a predominance of feed-forward interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown, both by theory and experiment, that the feed-forward loop performs signal processing tasks such as persistence detection, pulse generation and acceleration of transcription responses [53,55,56]. The same signature found in the antennation networks of the seed harvester ant P. californicus while engaged in foraging activities also suggests a functional similarity and selection for efficiency of directional information flow [27]. Remarkably, we did not find any such pattern in the antennation networks of R. marginata (electronic supplementary material, text S5).…”
Section: The Feed-forward Loopmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It has been shown, both by theory and experiment, that the feed-forward loop performs signal processing tasks such as persistence detection, pulse generation and acceleration of transcription responses [53,55,56]. The same signature found in the antennation networks of the seed harvester ant P. californicus while engaged in foraging activities also suggests a functional similarity and selection for efficiency of directional information flow [27]. Remarkably, we did not find any such pattern in the antennation networks of R. marginata (electronic supplementary material, text S5).…”
Section: The Feed-forward Loopmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The video acquisition system, previously described [66], enabled repeat recording of high-quality uncompressed AVI video (2024 Â 2024 pixels; 15 frames per second). Walking speeds of ants in a colony were estimated by manual tracking of all of the visibly moving ants within segments of video (30 s) which were recorded during the respirometry measurements [67,68].…”
Section: (E) Colony Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. pennsylvanicus is an ant species that has 35 evolved to nest inside dead trees; we mimicked this by maintaining colonies 36 inside wood under complete darkness. We focused on the oral exchange of food, 37 trophollaxis, as the key social interaction of interest because colonies must 38 balance efficient resource flow with mitigating disease spread (26) between individuals to the emergent, colony-wide properties that they produce 46 (27,28,29). Several network metrics are of particular relevance to disease 47 transmission, including degree and betweeness centrality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%