2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1361283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Precision, Noise, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in a nonrevealing equilibrium, lower prices are required for investors to hold securities about which they are uninformed. Several empirical studies have tested this theoretical prediction for the equity market and found that the higher degree of informed trading leads to lower current stock prices, and hence higher returns (e.g., Easley et al 2002Easley et al , 2010Burlacu et al 2008). One noticeable exception is Duarte and Young (2009), who find that liquidity, rather than information asymmetry, is priced in the cross section of stock returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in a nonrevealing equilibrium, lower prices are required for investors to hold securities about which they are uninformed. Several empirical studies have tested this theoretical prediction for the equity market and found that the higher degree of informed trading leads to lower current stock prices, and hence higher returns (e.g., Easley et al 2002Easley et al , 2010Burlacu et al 2008). One noticeable exception is Duarte and Young (2009), who find that liquidity, rather than information asymmetry, is priced in the cross section of stock returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%