2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33299-9_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Literacy in Legal Education: The Case of Istanbul Bilgi University

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The five core values were to differentiate between moral and unethical usages of info, collect info employing effective and efficient methods of inquiry, assess info, properly utilize info to tackle a specific issue or requirements and understand the legal issues associated with the discovery, use, or application of info. By extension, Cukadar and Kahvecioglu (2012) suggest that, with the rapid info explosion and emerging technologies that have transformed IRs from print to electronic as well as making the world a global village, legal personnel must have the capability to find and access, appraise and use both local and international legal IRs. Table 5 presents the data about the competency relating to the selection of IRs from the replies of respondents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five core values were to differentiate between moral and unethical usages of info, collect info employing effective and efficient methods of inquiry, assess info, properly utilize info to tackle a specific issue or requirements and understand the legal issues associated with the discovery, use, or application of info. By extension, Cukadar and Kahvecioglu (2012) suggest that, with the rapid info explosion and emerging technologies that have transformed IRs from print to electronic as well as making the world a global village, legal personnel must have the capability to find and access, appraise and use both local and international legal IRs. Table 5 presents the data about the competency relating to the selection of IRs from the replies of respondents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%