2015
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1045225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information is Power: Public Disclosure of Information in the Planning Decision-Making Process

Abstract: The legitimacy and effectiveness of community engagement in planning lies in the extent to which the public can access the information required for informed decision-making. The control of 'commercially sensitive material' by local authorities acting as gatekeepers is a therefore a challenging area of information management within the planning application process. Through the analysis of key cases in England, this paper identifies that regulations do provide for 'commercially sensitive material' to be released… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inability of the community to scrutinise viability models has also been a source of considerable dispute. There is a well-established body of work on public participation and transparency in the planning system (see Sheppard, Burgess and Croft, 2015 for a review). De Fine Licht (2014) demonstrates the relationships between perceived transparency, perceived fairness and decision acceptance.…”
Section: Incentives and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability of the community to scrutinise viability models has also been a source of considerable dispute. There is a well-established body of work on public participation and transparency in the planning system (see Sheppard, Burgess and Croft, 2015 for a review). De Fine Licht (2014) demonstrates the relationships between perceived transparency, perceived fairness and decision acceptance.…”
Section: Incentives and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant steps have been taken to bring the public into decision-making at different governance levels, including into 'Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects' (NSIPs) in the UK Rydin et al, 2015). The success of different types of participation is a matter of continued debate, including in this journal which has provided critiques of participation in planning (Brownill & Parker, 2010), including specifically for policy-making (Wilker et al, 2016) and regulatory stages (Sheppard et al, 2015). This article examines public perspectives where the public is involved in a particularly complex system of decision-making at different governance levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%