2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information fusion in practice: A distributed cognition perspective on the active role of users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The PSF aims to integrate the human user by treating her as a special type of sensor, one of many, but with certain privileges defined to dynamically account for variability in her performance as balanced against the consequence structure of the task. This approach is different than previous uses of psychophysiological methods to improve HAI, because the key here is human automation integration rather than mere interaction, an important point of discussion in the sensor fusion community [39].…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSF aims to integrate the human user by treating her as a special type of sensor, one of many, but with certain privileges defined to dynamically account for variability in her performance as balanced against the consequence structure of the task. This approach is different than previous uses of psychophysiological methods to improve HAI, because the key here is human automation integration rather than mere interaction, an important point of discussion in the sensor fusion community [39].…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such detailed and abstract analyses can provide several suggestions how to change the design to improve user performance and, in the long run, the work practice (Rogers, 2012). Hence, DCog is not a 'quick and dirty' approach but consequently, the DCog approach has been used as a base for the construction of methods in areas such as the Resources model (Wright, Fields, & Harrison, 2000), DIB method (Galliers et al, 2007), CASADEMA (Nilsson, 2010;Nilsson, Laere, Susi, & Ziemke, 2012) and DiCoT (Blandford & Furniss, 2006). Although these methods have their foundation in DCog, to varying extent, they oversimplify and sometimes omit several central aspects of importance for a detailed DCog analysis (Sellberg & Lindblom, 2014).…”
Section: The Theoretical Framework Of Distributed Cognition (Dcog)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a skilled DCog analyst has to be able to move between the different levels of analysis (Berndt et al 2014;Rogers 2012). Consequently, the DCog approach has been used as a base for the construction of methods in areas such as the resources model (Wright et al 2000), DIB method (Galliers et al 2007), CASADEMA (Nilsson et al 2012), and DiCoT (Blandford and Furniss 2005). Although these methods have their foundation in DCog, they sometimes oversimplify and omit several central aspects of importance for a detailed DCog analysis (Sellberg and Lindblom 2014).…”
Section: Applying Dcog Analyses Within Work Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e.g. Blandford and Furniss 2005;Galliers et al 2007;Nilsson et al 2012). However, none of these attempts to structure the approach into a method relates to interruptions, and it has been pointed out that the methods often show either a high complexity or a simplified approach that does not support a proper DCog analysis (Sellberg and Lindblom 2014).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%