Information frictions and entrepreneurship

Abstract

Research Summary Why do individuals become entrepreneurs? Why do some succeed? We propose two theories in which information frictions play a central role in answering these questions. Empirical analysis of longitudinal samples from the United States and the United Kingdom reveals the following patterns: (a) entrepreneurs have higher cognitive ability than employees with comparable education, (b) employees have better education than equally able entrepreneurs, and (c) entrepreneurs' earnings are higher and exhibit greater variance than employees with similar education. These and other empirical tests support our asymmetric information theory of entrepreneurship that when information frictions cause firms to undervalue workers lacking traditional credentials, workers' quest to maximize their private returns drives the most able into successful entrepreneurship. Managerial Summary Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Rachael Ray, and Oprah Winfrey are all entrepreneurs whose educational qualifications belie their extraordinary success. Are they outliers or do their examples reveal a link between education and success in entrepreneurship? We argue that employers assess potential workers based on their educational qualifications, especially early in their careers when there is little direct information on work accomplishments and productivity. This leads those who correctly believe that they are better than their résumés show to become successful entrepreneurs. Evidence from two nationally representative samples of workers (from the United States and the United Kingdom) supports our theory, which applies to equally to the immigrant food vendor lacking a high school diploma as well as the PhD founder of a science‐based startup.

Entrepreneurs as Scientists: A Pragmatist Approach to Producing Value Out of Uncertainty

“…Hence, the entrepreneur's job is cognitively demanding because it requires creativity, interpersonal skills necessary for customer empathy, and also analytical flexibility (Hegde & Tumlinson, 2020), for which there is important recent evidence (Levine & Rubinstein, 2017).…”

From Prison to Entrepreneurship: Can Entrepreneurship be a Reentry Strategy for Justice-Impacted Individuals?

“…Hwang and Phillips (2020) further argue that entrepreneurship offers justice-impacted individuals the opportunity to achieve higher earnings and economic mobility compared to not only unemployment but also employment. Unlike employees whose earnings depend on employers’ valuation of their potential ability, entrepreneurs are often more likely to earn as a function of their own ability (Hegde and Tumilson 2018). Therefore, for justice-involved individuals, who are more likely to be stigmatized and undervalued by employers, entrepreneurship offers an opportunity to earn competitive earnings without having to rely on or be hindered by employers’ negative perceptions (Hwang and Phillips 2020).…”

Ethnic entrepreneurship, assimilation, and integration policy

“…The empirical literature on entrepreneurship finds that, conditional on (observable) education level, individuals with higher levels of cognitive skills are more likely to become entrepreneurs. Hegde and Tumlinson (2017) find evidence on this relationship using US data and measuring cognitive skills by the Armed-Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) scores. Similarly, Van Praag and Cramer (2001) shows using a UK data set that individuals with higher IQ scores (i.e., a proxy variable for ability) are more likely to become entrepreneurs.…”