2008
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.019638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West

Abstract: Although there was more recognition for a patient's autonomy amongst physicians, most patients preferred a family centred model of care. Views towards information disclosure were midway between those of the USA and Japan. Distinctively, however, decisions regarding life prolonging therapy and assisted suicide were not influenced to a great extent by wishes of the patient or family, but more likely by religious beliefs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The paternalistic model of communication ("telling rather than asking") (12,13) that previously predominated in Europe has progressively given way to a model allowing for greater patient autonomy (14,15) (see also the article on collegial decision-making procedures in this issue). This new approach allows for greater involvement of the patient (if competent), and also the patient's family, by means of structured interviews (in particular with the caregivers in charge of the patient) in the decision-making process, especially as regards decisions to limit or withdraw lifesustaining therapies.…”
Section: The Specific Situation Of End-of-life Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paternalistic model of communication ("telling rather than asking") (12,13) that previously predominated in Europe has progressively given way to a model allowing for greater patient autonomy (14,15) (see also the article on collegial decision-making procedures in this issue). This new approach allows for greater involvement of the patient (if competent), and also the patient's family, by means of structured interviews (in particular with the caregivers in charge of the patient) in the decision-making process, especially as regards decisions to limit or withdraw lifesustaining therapies.…”
Section: The Specific Situation Of End-of-life Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In UAE, as in other Arab Gulf countries, health-related decisions are shared family affair and the family members are the provider of the social and spiritual supportive care for the sick family member [27,28]. As such the family members are the primary decision makers for their very sick patients [19,29]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Gulf Arab region, the family members often need to be reassured that their sick family members are receiving the best medical care [30]. The cultural value of hope, and not losing faith in cure might have driven the UAE family members to resist active withdrawal of a life supportive dialysis treatment and to insist in providing full medical support to their sick patients [19,31]. Furthermore, in situations with limited renal physician patient relationship, and because of fear of legal repercussions, renal physicians might avoid discussions of forgoing dialysis treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disparities between patients' perception of professionalism and the perception of Western-trained physicians are an added source of tension that must be resolved. 28 For example, the principle of patient confidentiality faces tensions in the family-centered culture of Qatar. Relatives of patients often blame physicians for withholding patient information from them.…”
Section: Exploring Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%