2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4790820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information-criterion based selection of models for community noise annoyance

Abstract: Statistical evidence for various models relating day-night sound level (DNL) to community noise annoyance is assessed with the Akaike information criterion. In particular, community-specific adjustments such as the community tolerance level (CTL, the DNL at which 50% of survey respondents are highly annoyed) and community tolerance spread (CTS, the difference between the DNL at which 90% and 10% are highly annoyed) are considered. The results strongly support models characterizing annoyance on a community-by-c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better capture differences in annoyance response between communities, a new methodology was introduced to derive exposure-response relationships. [ 168 214 215 216 ] Instead of statistically fitting the curve to the data, this method makes the strong assumption that the annoyance curve should closely resemble the loudness function, while differences between surveys are expressed in a decibel-equivalent shift named the “community tolerance level (CTL)”. The CTL can be used to express differences in “tolerance” to noise between communities, study, or site characteristics, but also between sources.…”
Section: Community Response To Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better capture differences in annoyance response between communities, a new methodology was introduced to derive exposure-response relationships. [ 168 214 215 216 ] Instead of statistically fitting the curve to the data, this method makes the strong assumption that the annoyance curve should closely resemble the loudness function, while differences between surveys are expressed in a decibel-equivalent shift named the “community tolerance level (CTL)”. The CTL can be used to express differences in “tolerance” to noise between communities, study, or site characteristics, but also between sources.…”
Section: Community Response To Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logistic regression analysis (LRA) is a standard statistical procedure in noise effects research for the derivation of exposure–response curves [ 83 , 85 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Thus, LRA was used to determine the probability to be (highly and moderately) annoyed by nocturnal aircraft noise exposure as a function of the different acoustical and non-acoustical variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the link function is specific to the distribution of the dependent variable, in this case annoyance. Since the basis of the dependent variable is highly annoyed, or not highly annoyed, our distribution is binomial and our corresponding link function is logit (Wilson et al 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%