2018
DOI: 10.2528/pierc17090903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Content in Inverse Source With Symmetry and Support Priors

Abstract: Abstract-This paper illustrates how inverse source problems are affected by certain symmetry and support priors concerning the source space. The study is developed for a prototype configuration where the field radiated by square integrable strip sources is observed in far-zone. Three symmetry priors are considered: the source is a priori known to be a real or Hermitian or even (resp. odd) function. Instead, as spatial priors we assume that the source support consists of a single or multiple disjoint domains. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The panels only zoom into a portion of the observation domain. In order to compare the capability to radiate the pattern provided by (21) along different maximum directions, we adopt as figures of merit both the half power beam width (HPBW), that is, the angular interval where the magnitude of the radiation pattern decreases by 50% (or −3 dB) from the peak, and the achieved directivity Table 1 reports the HPBW for the considered geometries. From the numerical results, it is clear that the main lobe widens by moving from the center of the observation domain to the extremal points, as expected from Figure 15, where the SC(θ) functions, generally, decrease toward θ = ±π/2.…”
Section: Pattern Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The panels only zoom into a portion of the observation domain. In order to compare the capability to radiate the pattern provided by (21) along different maximum directions, we adopt as figures of merit both the half power beam width (HPBW), that is, the angular interval where the magnitude of the radiation pattern decreases by 50% (or −3 dB) from the peak, and the achieved directivity Table 1 reports the HPBW for the considered geometries. From the numerical results, it is clear that the main lobe widens by moving from the center of the observation domain to the extremal points, as expected from Figure 15, where the SC(θ) functions, generally, decrease toward θ = ±π/2.…”
Section: Pattern Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as discussed in [19,20], the NDF is also linked to the information content of the radiated field. In [21], its link with some symmetry priors about the source space is investigated. As far as concerns the inverse source problem we want to address, the NDF measures the rank deficiency of the operator and hence the level of ill-posedness of the inversion problem [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be defined as the number of independent pieces of information necessary to represent the radiated field or, equivalently, the dimension of the subspace of the radiated field providing reliable solutions to the diagnostic problem. The NDF depends on the geometry of both the source and the field observation domain [11], but, unfortunately, cannot be evaluated in closed form for general source and observation domain geometries. Therefore, hereafter we suppose to know them by the numerical computation of the Singular Values (SVs) of the corresponding operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the far-field Green function, i.e., the kernel of the scattering operator, behaves similarly to an entire function of exponential type. This results in an abrupt decay of the singular values beyond a certain critical index, the so-called number of degrees of freedom (NDF) [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ] of the scattered field. This singular value behavior, on one hand, is the result of the ill-posedness of the problem [ 31 , 32 ], which limits the achievable performance in the reconstructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%