2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(03)00681-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information content and K-entropy of the present geomagnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last 25 yr, some papers have appeared suggesting that an imminent reversal could occur (e.g., De Santis et al, 2004 and the references therein). The recent dipole decrease is considered part of a trend that has continued for the last 2000 yr (Merrill and McElhinny, 1983) and a more rapid poleward drift of the dipole axis in the past 50 yr has also been suggested (Amit et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last 25 yr, some papers have appeared suggesting that an imminent reversal could occur (e.g., De Santis et al, 2004 and the references therein). The recent dipole decrease is considered part of a trend that has continued for the last 2000 yr (Merrill and McElhinny, 1983) and a more rapid poleward drift of the dipole axis in the past 50 yr has also been suggested (Amit et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This started a discussion about a forthcoming next inversion (polarity change), although field models in the scale of millennia show several periods of intensity decrease. Definite arguments that the present intensity decrease leads directly to dipole inversion and will not change to increase in the near future do not exist so far (Constable and Korte, 2006;De Santis et al, 2004).…”
Section: Magnetic Field Fadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators (e.g. De Santis et al, 2004) have speculated that this rapid decrease would be of global relevance implying the development of a dipole reversal as has happened several times in the Earth's history, but others have denied this possibility (Gubbins et al, 2006).…”
Section: Secular Variation and Geomagnetic Jerks In Antarcticamentioning
confidence: 99%