Information communication technology spending in (2008‐) economic crisis

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the impact of the recent (2008‐) economic crisis on information communication technology (ICT) spending. The empirical findings are discussed within a broader theoretical framework of technological trends/diffusion and economic cycles.Design/methodology/approachFirst, the paper introduces the innovation diffusion theory and theories of economic cycles. Next, it presents the analyses of the data from official statistics, international agencies and research companies. Finally, it summarizes the empirical findings within theoretical contexts.FindingsIn general, crises always reduce spending and therefore also ICT spending. However, focusing on the recent crisis, it affected the ICT market selectively and also much less than other sectors. In addition, the empirical findings indicate that after decades of fast ICT expansion (1971‐2000) we are now in the period of slower sectoral growth, which is in line with theories of super cycles, although, the authors also propose alternative explanations.Research limitations/implicationsThe impact of the economic crisis on the ICT market strongly depends on countries' economic situation and development stage. Nonetheless some ICT segments that allow cost savings, greater productivity and efficiency, have been strengthened during the latest (2008‐) economic crisis, which also pinpoints the directions for further transformation of ICT.Practical implicationsDespite usually reduced budgets during the crisis, managers should put increased attention to new/alternative ICT solutions (e.g. virtualization, outsourcing, cloud computing) and lowered prices of ICT products/services to increase competitiveness. The crisis can be thus an opportunity to re‐examine the contribution of ICT to productivity, workflow efficiency and introduce new methods for better exploitation of ICT capital.Social implicationsThe aim of this paper is to contribute to the understanding about the transformation of ICT in economic crises. It also demonstrates that recent crises caused another microwave within the last super cycle.Originality/valueThe paper provides empirical insight into the link between economic situation and ICT spending in past 15 years, with special attention to the changes observed during the latest (2008‐) crisis. The analysis is also put into a broader theoretical framework, where it proposes alternative explanations supported by empirical evidences.

Does Ict Capital Affect Economic Growth in the Eu-15 and Eu-12 Countries?

“…The following recovery lasted until July 2007 when the mortgage crisis in the USA started, which turned into the economic crisis and brought problems with public finances and the debt crisis. The paper of Rojko et al (2011) analyzed the impact of the 2008 economic crisis on total expenditures and thus also ICT expenditures. They concluded that the crisis reduced total expenditures and thus also ICT expenditures, but affected the ICT market selectively and also much less than other sectors.…”

Social Media Systems in the Workplace: Toward Understanding Employee Knowledge Creation via Microblogging within Shared Knowledge Domains

“…For example, in a study of 297 small-medium sized enterprises that adopted ICTs, the researchers found positive relationships between ICTs communicative orientation and the four knowledge creation patterns [44]. Similarly, electronic repositories have been found to be useful tools for facilitating knowledge creation practices and storing knowledge products [45,46]. In a study among 315 employees at a single organization, the results showed that intention to use social media for knowledge seeking and contributing is determined by employees' perceived usefulness of social media [15].…”

Toward an information systems architecture model for university hospitals: A case study in a Brazilian public hospital

“…Studies have revealed that three out of five organizations rated strategy execution as poor in their specific organizations. Several studies have suggested that the actual value of a strategy can be effectively implemented (Baqir et al, 2015; Keter, 2015; Rajasekar, 2014; Rojco et al, 2011). Similarly, researchers agree that implementing a strategy is more important than the strategy itself.…”