2004
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.103.037739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Bounds and Optimal Analysis of Dynamic Single Molecule Measurements

Abstract: Time-resolved single molecule fluorescence measurements may be used to probe the conformational dynamics of biological macromolecules. The best time resolution in such techniques will only be achieved by measuring the arrival times of individual photons at the detector. A general approach to the estimation of molecular parameters based on individual photon arrival times is presented. The amount of information present in a data set is quantified by the Fisher information, thereby providing a guide to deriving t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
175
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
175
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report represents the application of several recent developments in fluorescence single-molecule techniques based on information theory that use the information carried by each detected photon in an unbiased way (31,32,45). Our data-driven approach allows us to quantitatively account for photon-detection statistics, follow the time-dependent FRET distance changes photon-by-photon with the best possible time and distance resolution, and to unambiguously recover the entire FRET distance distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This report represents the application of several recent developments in fluorescence single-molecule techniques based on information theory that use the information carried by each detected photon in an unbiased way (31,32,45). Our data-driven approach allows us to quantitatively account for photon-detection statistics, follow the time-dependent FRET distance changes photon-by-photon with the best possible time and distance resolution, and to unambiguously recover the entire FRET distance distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize error and bias in calculating time-dependent donor-acceptor distances from single-molecule trajectories (see SI Materials and Methods), a change-point analysis (45) was applied to the data to determine the precise moment at which the dyes bleach. Distance vs. time data were extracted from trajectories using the maximumlikelihood analysis method (31). Data were then combined to form a probability distribution function using the Gaussian kernel method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is therefore also the probability of observing a PR value equal to x = A/S for bursts of S photons (11) Limiting ourselves to rational values x, this can be rewritten (12) where we define χ N (t) as the characteristic function of natural numbers (13) The total probability to observe the PR value x requires summing eq 12 over all burst sizes S, weighted by their probability, given by the burst size distribution (14) where B is the total number of bursts in the BSD, and S min (respectively, S max ) the smallest (respectively, largest) burst size taken into consideration. Introducing the characteristic function of rational numbers in [0, 1] (15) one obtains (16) Using eq 10, we end up with our final prediction of the probability distribution of PR values (in the absence of background) (17) To obtain the predicted PRH, a natural way could be to compute the number of predicted occurrences of each PR value x by multiplying eq 17 by the total number of bursts B and histogram these values with the same bin numbers as the PRH. In practice, however, this means calculating eq 17 for each possible rational value x accessible from bursts in the BSD, which number is close to (we neglect that, as shown in Figure 2, identical values can be obtained for several different burst sizes) (18) Since the calculations in eq 17 involve S max − S min + 1 terms, each one requiring a test of rationality of xS and evaluation of a CPU intensive expression, this approach may take quite some time for BSD with very large bursts.…”
Section: Shot-noise Contribution To the Prhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Because some subsequences involving one step transitions in the ON/OFF time series were removed from the analyses, 16 it is desired to confirm how such removals would affect in the analyses based on change point detection method. 36,38 It should also be noted that the SSN scheme groups a set of past subsequences (into a single state) whose transition probability distributions are regarded as identical within an error tolerance determined by the significance level. The grouping and resultant states depend on this significance level and even if two past subsequences are grouped into a certain state for a specific significance level, it might not be the case for another significance level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbolization and the number of symbols depend on the nature of time series, experimental setup, signal-to-noise ratio, and so forth. 23,36,38 The second step is to evaluate the transition probabilities from different subsequences (called past subsequences) to the future symbols, e.g., the transition probability P(s i |s 2 s 1 ) for any symbol s i (i=1,..., the total number of symbols) to appear at a time, say t, following a particular subsequence s 2 s 1 in which one observes s 1 at time t − 1 and s 2 at time t − 2. Similarly, the transition probabilities for all other past subsequences s j s k with past length two will be evaluated.…”
Section: A a Brief Description Of How To Construct Ssnmentioning
confidence: 99%