2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information asymmetry and information sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
43
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated 2 value is compared with the table 2 value for n-1 degrees of freedom and confidence probability (P = 0.95 or P = 0.99). If 2 > 2 , then the coefficient of concordation is true, but if 2 < 2 , then it is necessary to increase the number of experts.…”
Section: Analysis Of Results and Construction Of Schemes For The Corrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated 2 value is compared with the table 2 value for n-1 degrees of freedom and confidence probability (P = 0.95 or P = 0.99). If 2 > 2 , then the coefficient of concordation is true, but if 2 < 2 , then it is necessary to increase the number of experts.…”
Section: Analysis Of Results and Construction Of Schemes For The Corrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determines the degree to which subordinates communicate information about local conditions to their superiors Vertical information sharing exists when valuable information is spread throughout the organization. When information sharing does not occur, one individual may have more information than another, and none can have a complete set of information (Clarkson, Jacobsen, and Batcheller, 2007). Parker and Kyj (2006) Managerial Attitude (MA)…”
Section: Moynihan and Pandeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without an intermediary, such people would be exposed to information asymmetries, bounded rationality, and opportunistic behaviour that characterise an imperfect market (Allen & Santomero, 1998). Information asymmetries arise when people fail to engage successfully in financial transactions because they lack adequate information about the intentions and ability of others to honour their obligations (Clarkson, Jacobsen, & Batcheller, 2007). In an imperfect market, some economic actors may take advantage of others out of self-interest (opportunistic behaviour) while other economic actors make irrational decisions due to limited information, time, and cognitive ability (bounded rationality).…”
Section: Mfis and The Need For Youth Tailored Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%