2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.357521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information as Influence: How Institutions Mediate the Impact of Scientific Assessments on Global Environmental Affairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate change is cited as a complex and interdependent environmental challenge facing the world today [1] [2]. African countries including Tanzania are likely among the most world vulnerable to the impacts of climate change due to lack of inadequate adaptation capacities, economic development, and institutional capacity [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change is cited as a complex and interdependent environmental challenge facing the world today [1] [2]. African countries including Tanzania are likely among the most world vulnerable to the impacts of climate change due to lack of inadequate adaptation capacities, economic development, and institutional capacity [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seeking to clarify issues relating to the use of scientific and technical information in Community policy-making, the European Commission in June 2002 published a Communication detailing principles and guidelines for the use of expert advice (European Commission 2001a). The role of experts and use of expert advice in policy-making have also been the subject of extensive academic attention (Weinberg 1972;Jasanoff 1990;Liftin 1994;Jasanoff and Wynne 1998;Clark et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of the appropriate indicators depends firstly, on pragmatic factors, such as system boundaries (scale and typology of heritage) and availability of data, and secondly, on rather subjective aspects, such as the L, C, S-criteria, as defined by Clark et al: "The most influential assessments are those that are simultaneously perceived by a broad array of actors to possess 3 attributes: legitimacy, credibility and salience" [17] p. 7. Creating a set of indicators is a methodological compromise between local relevance, practical feasibility, availability of data, and theoretical justification.…”
Section: Criteria For the Selection Of The Appropriate Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%