Information Architecture of Web-Based Interventions to Improve Health Outcomes: Systematic Review

Abstract

BackgroundThe rise in usage of and access to new technologies in recent years has led to a growth in digital health behavior change interventions. As the shift to digital platforms continues to grow, it is increasingly important to consider how the field of information architecture (IA) can inform the development of digital health interventions. IA is the way in which digital content is organized and displayed, which strongly impacts users’ ability to find and use content. While many information architecture best practices exist, there is a lack of empirical evidence on the role it plays in influencing behavior change and health outcomes.ObjectiveOur aim was to conduct a systematic review synthesizing the existing literature on website information architecture and its effect on health outcomes, behavioral outcomes, and website engagement.MethodsTo identify all existing information architecture and health behavior literature, we searched articles published in English in the following databases (no date restrictions imposed): ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ebsco, and PubMed. The search terms used included information terms (eg, information architecture, interaction design, persuasive design), behavior terms (eg, health behavior, behavioral intervention, ehealth), and health terms (eg, smoking, physical activity, diabetes). The search results were reviewed to determine if they met the inclusion and exclusion criteria created to identify empirical research that studied the effect of IA on health outcomes, behavioral outcomes, or website engagement. Articles that met inclusion criteria were assessed for study quality. Then, data from the articles were extracted using a priori categories established by 3 reviewers. However, the limited health outcome data gathered from the studies precluded a meta-analysis.ResultsThe initial literature search yielded 685 results, which was narrowed down to three publications that examined the effect of information architecture on health outcomes, behavioral outcomes, or website engagement. One publication studied the isolated impact of information architecture on outcomes of interest (ie, website use and engagement; health-related knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs; and health behaviors), while the other two publications studied the impact of information architecture, website features (eg, interactivity, email prompts, and forums), and tailored content on these outcomes. The paper that investigated IA exclusively found that a tunnel IA improved site engagement and behavior knowledge, but it decreased users’ perceived efficiency. The first study that did not isolate IA found that the enhanced site condition improved site usage but not the amount of content viewed. The second study that did not isolate IA found that a tailored site condition improved site usage, behavior knowledge, and some behavior outcomes.ConclusionsNo clear conclusion can be made about the relationship between IA and health outcomes, given limited evidence in the peer-reviewed literatur...

Development and usability evaluation of an online self‐management intervention for fear of cancer recurrence (iConquerFear)

“…Factors underlying the acceptability and efficacy of online self‐management interventions are not well known, with limited guidance available regarding design issues, such as ordering and scheduling of content delivery . iConquerFear used a tunnelled design, which participant feedback indicated made website navigation straightforward and aided skill acquisition, consistent with previous literature .…”

“…Development was guided by Ritterband et al's internet intervention behaviour change model, focusing on optimising appearance, content, delivery, message, interactivity, behavioural prescriptions, burdens, and assessment. Three strategies were used to facilitate usage: (a) Tunnelling requires users to sequentially navigate the website, simplifying knowledge and skill acquisition by defining what users see and when . Access to later modules was contingent on completing preceding content.…”

Optimising Web-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Interventions for Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomised Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of Website Architecture on User Engagement

“…The intervention design was evidence-based, rigorous, and was grounded in behaviour change theory. Furthermore, unlike other website architecture experiments [24], computer tailoring occurred in both intervention arms. This placed the study emphasis on the website architecture, rather than the tailored content itself.…”

“…examined the impact of tunnelled modules delivered via different schedules among breast cancer survivors and found a trade-off effect between completion of modules (favouring a weekly group) versus acceptability and actual behaviour change (favouring a monthly group) [23]. A systematic review found only three website architecture experimentation studies [24]. Two of the studies compared a tunnelled tailored condition to a non-tailored control [25,26].…”

Adaptive Systems for Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatments

“…Conversely, if a user shows advanced understanding, the system adapts to illustrate with more detailed information. Using adaptive strategies is likely to overwhelm less [50], [51] novice users with complex content. Similarly, adaptive navigation intends to guide a user to their specific goal within the system by transforming the way the system is navigated based on certain factors (like goals of the user, previous history information, current skill levels) of the user.…”