Information and volatility linkages across energy and financial markets

Ding, Ashley

doi:10.1177/0312896219862320

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ding (2019) and McCredie et al (2019) research global GCs. Ding (2019) examines information and volatility linkages across energy and financial markets, and argues that, in a world economy as connected as ours, the impacts of issues such as climate change are likely to be transmitted through interlinked global markets. The study results suggest that volatility linkages across these markets are strong due to common information sharing and cross-market hedging, which means that impacts from climate change are likely to be felt as ripple effects throughout the economy.…”

Section: Gcs In Asia–pacific Management Research: Contributions Tomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The authors generate a framework that considers the roles and focus of business academics, in particular knowledge generation and application between groups of insiders and outsiders. Ding (2019) and McCredie et al (2019) research global GCs. Ding (2019) examines information and volatility linkages across energy and financial markets, and argues that, in a world economy as connected as ours, the impacts of issues such as climate change are likely to be transmitted through interlinked global markets.…”

Section: Gcs In Asia-pacific Management Research: Contributions To Thmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Grand challenges in management research: Attributes, achievements, and advancement

Brammer

Branicki

Linnenluecke

et al. 2019

Australian Journal of Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Management scholarship is increasingly paying attention to “grand challenges” such as climate and demographic changes, sociopolitical uncertainty, poverty alleviation, and global health improvement. Drawing upon a review of grand challenges research, we highlight the lack of a coherent conceptualization of a “grand challenge” and examine the diversity of the conceptual, policy, and empirical research. We problematize the failure in current research to distinguish between qualitatively different types of grand challenges—in our view, the resolution of different challenges calls for distinct research, policy, and practice approaches. We propose a novel framework that encompasses four distinct forms of grand challenge, situate the existing empirical literature within our framework, describe how the contributions to our special issue advance grand challenges research, and explore implications for future management research that responds to the imperatives of grand challenges.JEL Classification: D81, G01, M14, I18, Q54, Q55, Q56, Q57

show abstract

Section: Gcs In Asia–pacific Management Research: Contributions Tomentioning

confidence: 99%