2015
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2014.2341372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information and Statistical Efficiency When Quantizing Noisy DC Values

Abstract: This paper considers estimation of a quantized constant in noise when using uniform and nonuniform quantizers. Estimators based on simple arithmetic averages, on sample statistical moments and on the maximum-likelihood procedure are considered. It provides expressions for the statistical efficiency of the arithmetic mean by comparing its variance to the proper Cramér-Rao lower bound. It is conjectured that the arithmetic mean is optimal among all estimators with an exactly known bias. Conditions under which it… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, both estimators tend to provide similar results. Moreover, observe that already for σ = 0.2, the normalized standard deviation ofθ GM1 approximately achieves the square-root of the Cramer-Rao lower bound applicable to unbiased estimators of a quantized constant in Gaussian noise with known variance [9]. This becomes evident in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, both estimators tend to provide similar results. Moreover, observe that already for σ = 0.2, the normalized standard deviation ofθ GM1 approximately achieves the square-root of the Cramer-Rao lower bound applicable to unbiased estimators of a quantized constant in Gaussian noise with known variance [9]. This becomes evident in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Consider however that model 2 can be reduced to model 1 if the known value of the noise standard deviation is substituted by an estimate of it obtained using alternative Fig. 6 and the corresponding Cramer-Rao lower bound for unbiased estimators, derived using an expression published in [9]. estimators as in [15] [21].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the plots, the approximate regime boundaries are computed to be ξ 1 = {0.1098, 3.85 × 10 −2 , 9.56 × 10 −3 } and ξ 2 = {0.2296, 0.3132, 0.3737} for K = {5, 25, 125}, respectively, confirming that Regime II expands as K increases. In Regime I, the NMSE performance of all estimators on K = 5 < Z =" Regime I Regime II Regime III NMSE(mean) NMSE(mid) NVar(GGML) NCRB (7 Regime I Regime II Regime III NMSE(mean) NMSE(mid) NVar(GGML) Regime I Regime II Regime III NMSE(mean) NMSE(mid) NVar(GGML) Regime I Regime II Regime III NMSE(mean) NMSE(mid) Fig. 7: The results of our Monte Carlo simulations lead to a simplified decision process for when and how to use dither.…”
Section: A Normalized Mse Vs σ Z /∆mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, consider the quantization of a constant signal affected by white Gaussian noise. Moschitta et al [3] show that the amount of information at the quantizer output vanishes when the noise standard deviation tends to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%