2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
1,089
0
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,179 publications
(1,132 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
6
1,089
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavioral response examined in our study was birds’ attraction to heterospecific mobbing calls to within 15 m of the playback center, under the context that we simulated of a perched predator being mobbed. On the part of the prey species, such attraction confers the benefit of increased information about the predator (e.g., its status, area of use; Dall et al., 2005; Seppänen et al., 2007), but typically does not involve the high risk and intense antipredator behaviors prey face most of the time with regard to ambush predators and surprise attacks, because the predator is already well located and unlikely to attack (Altmann, 1956). Therefore, the aspect of prey vulnerability most directly relevant to our study should concern the identity of predators the prey are vulnerable to, and therefore most likely to mob, rather than the modes of predator–prey interactions such as predator detection and escape, to which traits such as foraging technique and predator detection/escape strategy would have been more relevant (Lima, 1993; Sridhar et al., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavioral response examined in our study was birds’ attraction to heterospecific mobbing calls to within 15 m of the playback center, under the context that we simulated of a perched predator being mobbed. On the part of the prey species, such attraction confers the benefit of increased information about the predator (e.g., its status, area of use; Dall et al., 2005; Seppänen et al., 2007), but typically does not involve the high risk and intense antipredator behaviors prey face most of the time with regard to ambush predators and surprise attacks, because the predator is already well located and unlikely to attack (Altmann, 1956). Therefore, the aspect of prey vulnerability most directly relevant to our study should concern the identity of predators the prey are vulnerable to, and therefore most likely to mob, rather than the modes of predator–prey interactions such as predator detection and escape, to which traits such as foraging technique and predator detection/escape strategy would have been more relevant (Lima, 1993; Sridhar et al., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting this, Monteiro's storm-petrel is a burrow-or cavity-nesting bird, so that information on pair BS is unlikely to be public. Under these conditions, distant environmental quality might be better reflected by personal information [7], such as personal foraging effort [41], than by social public information-unless such pelagic birds also have access to public information on collective foraging effort at sea. However, whether these storm-petrels forage in a restricted common marine area is still unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They select habitats by using a combination of direct resource cues, such as the quality and quantity of safe nest sites or food resources, and indirect social cues, such as the presence or breeding performance of conspecifics (Danchin et al 2004;Dall et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%