Informal Caring and Labour Market Outcomes Within England and Wales

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu In particular, given that these areas typically have the lowest economic activity and employment rates, labour market differences can be exacerbated by the provision of informal caring by people of working age. Despite the wide variations in informal care provision, it is found that labour market outcomes do not differ markedly by different care categories across spatial areas within England and Wales. However, the analysis reveals that labour market outcomes for males as well as females are heavily influenced for those who provide high levels of caring, especially in the South Wales Valleys. For example, the largest impact of caring on the probability of not working for males and for part-time work for females is seen in this area. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SJEL Classification: J22, R23

The relationship between elder care-giving and labour force participation in the context of policies addressing population ageing: a review of empirical studies published between 2006 and 2016

“…The reviewers noted that in lieu of intensity controls, a significant and positive association between LFP and mid-life women's light care provision would most likely mask any negative LFP effects of heavy care-giving for this sub-population. Moreover, cross-region and cross-country studies indicate care-giving intensity as the principle channel through which norms and policy condition the care-giving and LFP relationship (Bolin, Lindgren and Lundborg 2008; Drinkwater 2015; Kotsadam 2011).…”

“…As noted earlier, the pursuit of these details should not compromise sample selection and the policy relevance of results. However, despite this problem and the reservations of some researchers (Drinkwater 2015; Lilly, Laporte and Coyte 2010), most instruments used in the post-2006 studies have been both empirically applicable and demonstrably strong predictors of women's intensive care-giving 3 (Bolin, Lindgren and Lundborg 2008; Crespo and Mira 2014; Jacobs et al 2014 b , 2014 c ; Johnson and Lo Sasso 2006; Nguyen and Connelly 2014; Van Houtven, Coe and Skira 2013; Watts 2010). As exceptions, the very poor health of recipients and a need for constant attendance appear to be weak predictors of care-giving.…”

Introduction to the Handbook of Research Methods on the Quality of Working Lives

“…Unpaid care work is often lower quality and associated with the presence of constraint. It can limit the ability of carers (who remain more likely to be women) to participate in paid work, or at least limit it to part-time or reduced hours, during certain parts of their lives (Carmichael et al, 2008;Drinkwater, 2015). It may also impede engagement in some forms of unpaid work, e.g.…”

The Hard Work of Balancing Employment and Caregiving: What Can Canadian Employers Do to Help?

“…This full employment is achievable only if caregiving responsibilities are not overwhelming. While the vast majority of caregivers in Canada provide far less than 10 hours per week of care, new evidence now firmly establishes that intensive caregiving of 15 to 20+ hours per week is predictive of leaving the labour force (Lilly et al 2010;Colombo et al 2011;drinkwater 2011). This natural limit on voluntary labour underscores an important role for provincial ministries of health as well.…”