1964
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.19641060302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influx und Efflux bei der Kaliumaufnahme junger Gerstenwurzeln

Abstract: Verschiedentlich wurde festgestellt, dai3 lebende Pflanzenwurzeln NEhr-Ionen an das Aui3enmedium abscheiden (2, 3, 6, 8, 11, 12). Nach Hoagland und Bvoyer (5) geben Gerstenwurzeln an aqua dest. geringe Mengen an K+ ab. Helder (4) berichtet, dai3 junge Gerstenwprzeln Rb+ an das Auflenmedium abgeben. In Abwesenheit von Ca++ in der Nahrlosung war dieser Rb-Efflux besonders hoch. Bei den genannten Untersuchungen iiber den Kationen-Efflux ist no& ungeklart, ob diese Kationen aus dem Freien Raum stammen oder aus dem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If, however, under these experimental conditions the use of Rb-86 also does not clearly reflect the uptake of K+ (see also West and Pitman 1967;Schaedle and Jacobson 1967;Jescbke 1970), it must be concluded that both cations behave differently during the uptake process itself. It must, however, be mentioned that this different behaviour of both ions has nothing to d o with an effect often discussed in experiments with labelled ions (Mengel 1964; namely that the influx of the labelled ion (radio nuclid) overestimates the net uptake of the element as a result of exchange and efflux processes. This effect of course also takes place when K' is labelled with Rb-86 ( M a a s and Leggett 1969;Hiatt 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…If, however, under these experimental conditions the use of Rb-86 also does not clearly reflect the uptake of K+ (see also West and Pitman 1967;Schaedle and Jacobson 1967;Jescbke 1970), it must be concluded that both cations behave differently during the uptake process itself. It must, however, be mentioned that this different behaviour of both ions has nothing to d o with an effect often discussed in experiments with labelled ions (Mengel 1964; namely that the influx of the labelled ion (radio nuclid) overestimates the net uptake of the element as a result of exchange and efflux processes. This effect of course also takes place when K' is labelled with Rb-86 ( M a a s and Leggett 1969;Hiatt 1970).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To use the rate equation procedure we need to know the relation between I and c (which is QI v) and E and c to substitute into equation 3 When depletion curves are conducted over time periods long enough to have appreciable root growth, the increase in L with t can be accounted for by using the expression: L = Loe'.t (7) where L. is the root length at the start of the experiment and k, measured separately, is a constant describing the rate of L increase with t. This procedure can also be used to measure diurnal changes of K flux into the root by adding K at a constant rate over a period of 1 or 2 days and following the change in K concentration with time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WVhile at a pH of 5.0 or higher, the K loss by 6 day old barley roots was found to be very small, at pH 4.0 a sharp increase in K loss was found to occur, some 40 % of the initial K content being lost in 3 hours to dilute HBr at this pH. In contrast to this, K is lost in large amounts by corn root tips placed in distilled water with a pH of 5.8 (8) and by 2 to 3 day old barley roots to NaCl solutions at a similar pH (16 The effects of Ca upon ion tiptake as well as upon loss of ions from plant tissue have been the subject of many investigations (2,3,4,8,10,11,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27). Ca has been shown to reduce greatly the loss of K from 6 day old barley roots at pH 4.0 (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%