“…RT-PCR analysis for the presence of vRNA and/or cRNA in the cytoplasm of cells infected by pHL1354 (A) or pHL1844 (B) recombinant viruses at 5 h postinfection+ Reverse transcription for CAT-specific vRNAs and cRNAs followed by PCR amplification were done similarly to Figure 4 with DNAse pretreated cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of MDCK cells infected by pHL1354 or pHL1844 recombinant viruses, respectively; at the second step of viral passage+ A control PCR reaction (lane C), which was not preceded by an RT reaction, was done in each case to prove the absence of plasmid DNA in the cytoplasmic RNA preparation+ The purity of the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions was controlled by canine p53 hnRNA/mRNA RT-PCR across intron 7 with expected fragments of 289 bp (mRNA) and 551 bp (hnRNA)+ Expected PCR products for pHL1354 CAT-cRNA (668 bp) (A) and for pHL1844 CAT-vRNA (855 bp) (B) have been indicated at the left margin, and the p53 RT-PCR product sizes are marked at the right margin+ For sizes of marker bands (lanes M) see Figure 4, right margin+ (Murti et al+, 1992)+ These interactions have not so far been differentiated with regard to the RNP constituents, NP and polymerase+ Due to the demonstrated requirement of a (59-bulged) vRNA promoter structure for nuclear export, we propose an M1 interaction with RNA-polymerase rather than NP, in the respective vRNA-bound conformation, with or without assistance by other components as listed above+ This conclusion is also supported by the published failure to demonstrate an NP-M1 interaction in vivo in the absence of polymerase (Zhao et al+, 1998), whereas various RNA polymerase activities, in particular initiation reactions, have been shown to be inhibited by M1 addition, both in vivo (Watanabe et al+, 1996) and in vitro (Ye et al+, 1987)+ In a potential chain of protein interactions leading to vRNP nuclear export, viral NS2 is likely to occupy a more downstream position because of its specific interaction with cellular CRM1, which in turn interacts with the standard cellular machinery such as Ran-GTP, and ultimately with components of the nuclear pore complex (Neumann et al+, 2000)+ However, NS2's mode of "upstream" interaction with vRNP, M1, and/or other factors is not known at present+ Incorporation into the budding progeny virion of several cytoplasmic vRNPs in association with M1 and/or cellular transport factors has to be brought about through interaction with other partners present in that new compartment at the plasma membrane+ Likely candidates in this regard are the negatively charged phospholipid membrane itself (Ruigrok et al+, 2000), or interactions of M1 with the cytoplasmic tails of the glycoproteins HA and NA (Mitnaul et al+, 1996;Zhou et al+, 1998;Ali et al+, 2000) as well as M2+ Such interactions are known to bring about conformational changes in M1 during budding, whereas their absence results in aberrant influenza particle shapes (Jin et al+, 1997)+…”