Influenza Vaccination: The Persuasiveness of Messages Among People Aged 65 Years and Older

Abstract

About 90% of all influenza-related deaths occur among people aged 65 years and older. Vaccination remains the primary option for preventing influenza infection. This study examined the efficacy of messages designed to increase the uptake of influenza vaccination. Two messages, narrative and didactic, were created based on the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). The study employed a one-factor between-subjects experimental design with participants assigned randomly to three conditions: no message, didactic communication, and narrative communication. Participants were 311 Italian people aged 65 years or older. The results showed that, compared to no message and didactic communication, narrative communication was related to higher risk perception of influenza, to higher perception of the efficacy of the vaccine, and to self-efficacy related to vaccination, controlling for social trust, previous flu shot, and demographic variables. There were no differences among the three conditions with respect to the intention to receive the influenza vaccine. Findings suggest that narrative communication based on EPPM may have a persuasive effect on people aged 65 years or older.

Getting vaccinated or not getting vaccinated? Different reasons for getting vaccinated against seasonal or pandemic influenza

“…In literature, we could find some models that could help build an understanding of how to design effective campaigns or trainings. For example, in a recent study of Prati, Pietrantoni and Zani [19], the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM) [20] was analysed to better understand the persuasive messages concerning the influenza vaccination. This theory claims that fear appeals are likely to produce threat appraisal, and the appraisal of efficacy of the recommended response and self-efficacy.…”

Do interventions containing risk messages increase risk appraisal and the subsequent vaccination intentions and uptake? – A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…The remaining study (Gerend & Shepherd, ) was conducted in a laboratory within a university. Four studies used conditional risk questions, whereas 14 used unconditional risk questions (an example of a conditional risk question used is ‘What is the likelihood that you will get the flu this year if you don't get a flu shot?’ (Prati et al ., )) (Table ).…”

“…In the study by Prati et al . (), a combined risk outcome measure was reported. All of this information was extracted.…”

Preventable Disease Practices Among a Lower SES, Multicultural, Nonurban, U.S. Community: The Roles of Vaccination Efficacy and Personal Constraints

“…that were measured on a 1-5 importance scale for how important the factors were when deciding whether or not to receive a flu vaccination. These measures were based on HBM constructs of perceived effectiveness and perceived barriers and similar to the reliable vaccine efficacy scale used by Prati, Pietrantoni, and Zani (2012). To create a "personal constraint" composite score, four variables were used to create a composite score (α = .721): will it hurt, will it be convenient, how much will it cost, and how long will it take to get one (tapping the perceived barriers and self-efficacy HBM constructs).…”