Abstract:Objectives: As no data are available regarding the influenza vaccination status of Swiss healthcare workers (HCW) in the ambulatory setting, this study aims to investigate their influenza vaccination behaviours.Methods: We conducted an online survey using a four-item, semi-structured questionnaire to assess HCWs influenza vaccination coverage and behaviour. Associations between influenza vaccination status, age and language as well as recommendation behaviour and reasons for vaccination were assessed using des… Show more
“…In contrast to the 2015/16 survey [22] and other vaccination studies in Switzerland [16,44], IVR in 2020/21 had no association with the language of the HCWs. This phenomenon could be an influence of the pandemic.…”
Section: Vaccination Status By Profession Language and Agecontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Taken alone, age continues to be positively associated with influenza and COVID-19 vaccination uptake among HCWs, as also confirmed in other national and international studies [15,17,21,22,33,37]. This is also confirmed in the multivariable logistic regression for influenza, but for COVID-19 vaccination, age was no longer a predictor of getting vaccinated during the 2020/ 21 season.…”
Section: Vaccination Status By Profession Language and Agesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2022 using a online-questionnaire available in three of the four national Swiss languages: German, French and Italian. To ensure comparability with the 2016 survey [ 22 ], the same method of data collection was used and the same target population was addressed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow a direct comparison to the results of the 2015/16 survey, the same questions regarding influenza vaccination were used [ 22 ]. For COVID-19 vaccination, the question template was replicated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we assessed COVID-19 vaccination rate (CVR), recommendations and reasoning and compared these results with the respective influenza results. To assess the possible impact of the pandemic on IVR, we replicated the methodology, sampling design and sampling of the pre-pandemic cross-sectional survey from 2015/16 [ 22 ].…”
Objectives: To assess and compare influenza and COVID-19 vaccination uptake of Swiss healthcare workers (HCWs) in primary care 2020/21.Methods: Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination uptake and recommendation behaviours of HCWs in the primary care were assessed using an online semi-structured questionnaire. Associations between vaccination rates and age, language, gender, profession, vaccination history, vaccination training and recommendation behaviours were evaluated using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses.Results: Vaccinated against COVID-19 in 2020/21 were 91.8% of the 1,237 participating HCWs, while 60.1% were vaccinated against influenza. Physicians and pharmacists presented the highest influenza vaccination rates (87.3%, 73.7%, respectively) compared to nurses (45.8%) and medical practice assistants (52.5%) while COVID-19 vaccination rates were high across all professions. Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination rates were significantly associated with age, profession, vaccination history, vaccination training and recommendation behaviours.Conclusion: Acceptance for influenza vaccination has increased during the pandemic but is lower than that for COVID-19 among the HCWs. Demographics, vaccination status and vaccination training impact the vaccination behaviour among HCWs and should be considered in future campaigns to increase vaccination uptake.
“…In contrast to the 2015/16 survey [22] and other vaccination studies in Switzerland [16,44], IVR in 2020/21 had no association with the language of the HCWs. This phenomenon could be an influence of the pandemic.…”
Section: Vaccination Status By Profession Language and Agecontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Taken alone, age continues to be positively associated with influenza and COVID-19 vaccination uptake among HCWs, as also confirmed in other national and international studies [15,17,21,22,33,37]. This is also confirmed in the multivariable logistic regression for influenza, but for COVID-19 vaccination, age was no longer a predictor of getting vaccinated during the 2020/ 21 season.…”
Section: Vaccination Status By Profession Language and Agesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2021 and February 2022 using a online-questionnaire available in three of the four national Swiss languages: German, French and Italian. To ensure comparability with the 2016 survey [ 22 ], the same method of data collection was used and the same target population was addressed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow a direct comparison to the results of the 2015/16 survey, the same questions regarding influenza vaccination were used [ 22 ]. For COVID-19 vaccination, the question template was replicated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we assessed COVID-19 vaccination rate (CVR), recommendations and reasoning and compared these results with the respective influenza results. To assess the possible impact of the pandemic on IVR, we replicated the methodology, sampling design and sampling of the pre-pandemic cross-sectional survey from 2015/16 [ 22 ].…”
Objectives: To assess and compare influenza and COVID-19 vaccination uptake of Swiss healthcare workers (HCWs) in primary care 2020/21.Methods: Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination uptake and recommendation behaviours of HCWs in the primary care were assessed using an online semi-structured questionnaire. Associations between vaccination rates and age, language, gender, profession, vaccination history, vaccination training and recommendation behaviours were evaluated using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses.Results: Vaccinated against COVID-19 in 2020/21 were 91.8% of the 1,237 participating HCWs, while 60.1% were vaccinated against influenza. Physicians and pharmacists presented the highest influenza vaccination rates (87.3%, 73.7%, respectively) compared to nurses (45.8%) and medical practice assistants (52.5%) while COVID-19 vaccination rates were high across all professions. Influenza and COVID-19 vaccination rates were significantly associated with age, profession, vaccination history, vaccination training and recommendation behaviours.Conclusion: Acceptance for influenza vaccination has increased during the pandemic but is lower than that for COVID-19 among the HCWs. Demographics, vaccination status and vaccination training impact the vaccination behaviour among HCWs and should be considered in future campaigns to increase vaccination uptake.
Influenza and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination are recommended in both solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients. In Puglia, Southern Italy, an active vaccination offer program has been activated targeting these patients. This study aims at investigating vaccination coverage (VC) for both vaccines in a SOT patients’ cohort, as well as at identifying the vaccination compliance determinant. This is a retrospective, population-based study. The study population consists of the SOT patients who accessed Bari’s “Policlinico” General Hospital during 2017–2022. Patients were contacted and, after providing their consent, asked their immunization status regarding influenza and COVID-19 and whether they had already undergone transplant or were waiting to do so. Regression models were fitted to investigate the determinants of VCs for influenza vaccination (2021/22 and 2022/23 seasons) and for COVID-19 vaccination (three-dose base cycle, first and second booster doses). Three-hundred and ten SOT patients were identified; 85.2% (264/310) had already undergone SOT. VCs were suboptimal, especially for constant yearly influenza vaccination (17.7%) and COVID-19 vaccination’s second booster (1.94%). Logistic regression highlighted that influenza VCs are higher for SOT recipients than SOT candidates, as well as for older patients, although when considering both vaccination seasons only age significantly impact the vaccination uptake. Older age was the only influential variable for COVID-19 VC. VCs for SOT patients seem to be unsatisfying. Stronger interventions are required.
Influenza is a health problem and vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent it. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccination coverage (VC) against influenza in healthcare workers (HCWs). A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Dr. Balmis University General Hospital in the province of Alicante (Spain), in which vaccination data were collected retrospectively. Adverse effects (AEs) were detected via telephone call between 15 and 30 days after vaccination. The existence of significant changes in VC between the different seasons studied was evaluated using Chi square with a statistical significance level of p < 0.05. A total of 8403 HCWs vaccinated throughout the different seasons were studied. The vaccination coverage of HCWs for influenza pre-COVID-19 pandemic (2019/20 season) was 51.9%; increased during the pandemic to 67.9% (2020/21 season) and 65.5% (2021/22 season); and, after the pandemic, it decreased to 42.7% (2022/23 season) (p < 0.05). The most frequent reason for vaccination during the periods evaluated was “self-protection”, followed by “protection of patients” and “protection of family members”. Of all HCWs evaluated, 26.6% (1460/5493) reported at least one AE. During the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs’ influenza vaccination coverage fluctuated considerably. There has been an increase in VC during the most critical moments of the pandemic, both in the 2020/21 and 2021/22 seasons, which has, subsequently, decreased in the 2022/2023 season, to levels below pre-pandemic (2019/2020 season), which justifies implementing specific measures to recover VC in Spain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.