2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-016-2620-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influenza A and B co-infection: a case–control study and review of the literature

Abstract: Influenza virus infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality during winter seasons. Bacterial and virus co-infection is a commonly described situation in these patients. However, data on co-infection by influenza A and B viruses are lacking. In this study, we present the cases of co-infection by influenza A and B viruses during the winter season of 2014-2015 in our institution. We analyzed 2759 samples from 2111 patients and found that 625 samples corresponding to 609 patients were positive for i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings that selection is likely to act upon both antigenic and non-antigenic gene segments and that reassortment can influence the rate of virus adaptive evolution have important implications for predicting future influenza strains. In particular, our study indicates that viral mutations are subjected to linkage effects within and to a somewhat lesser extent between gene segments, consistent with the conclusions of (37). As a consequence, we anticipate better forecasting can be achieved if the virus genetic background is considered as a whole, and is not just restricted to HA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings that selection is likely to act upon both antigenic and non-antigenic gene segments and that reassortment can influence the rate of virus adaptive evolution have important implications for predicting future influenza strains. In particular, our study indicates that viral mutations are subjected to linkage effects within and to a somewhat lesser extent between gene segments, consistent with the conclusions of (37). As a consequence, we anticipate better forecasting can be achieved if the virus genetic background is considered as a whole, and is not just restricted to HA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nevertheless, the number of influenza coinfections can be estimated when viral strains involved belong to either different subtypes or types (e.g. A/H3N2 and A/H1N1 or influenza A and B viruses, respectively) (36, 37). These types of coinfection have been known to occur between 1-2% in sampled influenza A viral infections (36-38).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on possible co‐infections with IAV and the other influenza virus types in swine is not available; in humans, co‐infection of IAV/IBV was seen in 1.6% of a case study . This aspect was addressed by examining an additional 171 samples from 25 farms with swine acutely infected with IAV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocirculation of distinct influenza types, subtypes, and strains has allowed for rare coincidental infection with more than one type or subtype of influenza . In addition, consecutive infection with influenza A and B viruses within a single season has been demonstrated .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%