Influential Factors, Enablers, and Barriers to Adopting Smart Technology in Rural Regions: A Literature Review

Abstract

Smart Technology is a quickly and constantly evolving concept; it has different applications that cover a wide range of areas, such as healthcare, education, business, agriculture, and manufacturing. An effective application of these technologies increases productivity and performance within complex systems. On one side, trends show a lack of appeal for rural environments as people prefer to move to cities, looking for better opportunities and lifestyles. On the other side, recent studies and reports show that the attractiveness of rural areas as places with opportunities is increasing. Sustainable solutions are needed to enhance development in the rural context, and technological innovation is expected to lead and support the stability for people and organizations in rural regions. While Smart City is progressively becoming a reality and a successful model for integrating Smart Technology into different aspects of everyday life, its effective application in a rural context according to a Sustainable Development approach is not yet completely defined. This study adopts comparative and categorial content analysis to address the different applications and the specific characteristics of rural regions, which often present significant peculiarities depending on the country and the context. The main goal is to investigate and discuss how the Smart City model may be adopted and effectively applied within rural contexts, looking at major gaps and challenges. Additionally, because of the complexity of the topic, we provide an overview of the current adoption of Smart Technology in the different applications in rural areas, including farming, education, business, healthcare, and governance. The study highlights the huge difficulties in rural life and the potentiality of Smart Technology to enhance their Sustainable Development, which is still challenging. While the holistic analysis clearly points out a gap, there is no specific strategic roadmap to re-use or adapt existing models, such as Smart City. The study does not address fine-grained indicators.

Digitization Processes in Slovak Healthcare Sector – The Issue of Slovak Doctors and Nurses

“…As a result of rapid urbanization, smart cities are emerging to solve urban issues in various sectors such as healthcare, transportation, environment, welfare, economy, security, energy and efficient distribution of urban resources. Smart technology is the basis for providing various services through devices to which ICT capabilities are used while supporting various applications in a wide range of fields such as healthcare, education, commerce, agriculture and manufacturing (Samarakkody 2022;Myeong 2022;Alabdali 2023). In this process, city and municipal governments play an important role by integrating smart services into all application domains including healthcare, transportation, clean and green technologies, entertainment and leisure facilities, and crowd management (Hashem et al 2023).…”

A Social Perspective on AI in the Higher Education System: A Semisystematic Literature Review

“…AI is perceived by people differently depending on the context. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) is recognized as a technological innovation capable of revolutionizing traditional education by offering highly personalized, scalable, and cost-effective alternative solutions [12,19,29,44].…”

“…Secondly, the emergence of AI-powered chatbots such as ChatGPT has taken the education system by storm and generated substantial discussions within the field [16,23,44,64,65]. It is a type of generative AI tool that uses an advanced language model created by Ope-nAI [38,66].…”

Performance and sustainability evaluation of rural digitalization and its driving mechanism: evidence from Hunan province of China

“…Second, the research on the characteristics, evolution mode and influencing factors of rural digitalization provides the basis for the planning and policy design of digital village, smart village and village 4.0. Most papers in this field mainly discuss national scale rural digitalization planning, policies, experiences, lessons, opportunities, and barriers in the paradigm of case studies and empirical research (Fennell, 2018;Alabdali, 2023). For example, scholars from different countries, based on case studies or local development actuality, have analyzed the practice and progress of rural digitization in pioneer or leading countries, including the United States (Li, 2020), the European Union (Adesipo, 2020), Australia (Park, 2017;Randell-Moon, 2022), Slovenia (Zavratnik, 2018), Canada (Spicer, 2018), Ireland (McGuire, 2022, Poland (Adamowicz, Wojcik, 2021), Spain (Escalona-Orcao, 2016, and China (Li, 2022).…”