2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencing factors of moisture measurement when using microwave reflection method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study reinforces findings from other studies (Gartner 2010;Kurik et al 2017;Orr et al 2020) that the MMMS can be usefully applied to cultural heritage settings to understand moisture dynamics. The calibration done in this study shows that the MMMS can be used on basaltic scoria.…”
Section: Advantages Of the Mmmssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study reinforces findings from other studies (Gartner 2010;Kurik et al 2017;Orr et al 2020) that the MMMS can be usefully applied to cultural heritage settings to understand moisture dynamics. The calibration done in this study shows that the MMMS can be used on basaltic scoria.…”
Section: Advantages Of the Mmmssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The efficacy of the microwave moisture meter in accurately sensing a range of moisture contents for different building stones (Blaeuer et al 2009;Kurik et al 2017;Orr et al 2020) and brick (Gartner 2010) has been tested in laboratory settings with different set ups. Granite, limestone, dolostone and sandstones have been the focus of these studies but as yet no studies have been done to test the MMMS on basaltic scoria (as found in Lalibela).…”
Section: Gravimetric Calibration Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%