2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2000682117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices

Abstract: Past research demonstrates that unconscious primes can affect people’s decisions. However, these free choice priming paradigms present participants with very few alternatives. Magicians’ forcing techniques provide a powerful tool to investigate how natural implicit primes can unconsciously influence decisions with multiple alternatives. We used video and live performances of the mental priming force. This technique uses subtle nonverbal and verbal conversational primes to influence spectators to choose the thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously found similar ratings of sense of control ( M = 45) in experiments using the crisscross force (Pailhès & Kuhn, 2020a) and for which participants did not understand they were manipulated. However, higher ratings were found in our research using the position force technique ( M = 82; Pailhès & Kuhn, 2020b). Contrary to the position force, both the equivoque and the crisscross are outcomes forces, in which the magician physically intervenes during the trick.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We previously found similar ratings of sense of control ( M = 45) in experiments using the crisscross force (Pailhès & Kuhn, 2020a) and for which participants did not understand they were manipulated. However, higher ratings were found in our research using the position force technique ( M = 82; Pailhès & Kuhn, 2020b). Contrary to the position force, both the equivoque and the crisscross are outcomes forces, in which the magician physically intervenes during the trick.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…These Decision forces encompass a large number of techniques in which magicians covertly influence spectators' decision, and several of these techniques have been empirically investigated. For example, people can be covertly influenced by the positioning of a card among others (Kuhn, Pailhès, & Lan, 2020;Pailhès & Kuhn, 2020b), the timing on which cards are handled by the magician, subtly pushing the target card when the spectator's fingers are reaching the deck to take one (Shalom et al, 2013), the visual saliency of the target card (Olson, Amlani, Raz, & Rensink, 2015), or even subtle gestures that prime a specific card (Pailhès & Kuhn, 2020a). It is important to note that whilst many of these techniques are highly effective, there is no guarantee that they will work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the magician gestures a Diamond shape while asking participants to imagine a screen in their mind, or quickly draws little 3s in the air while asking them to imagine the numbers on the card. This force has been shown to be effective for 18% of participants, when we would expect less than 2% by chance [9].…”
Section: Mental Priming Forcementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Forcing techniques provide powerful tools to investigate illusory sense of agency and freedom over choices. Empirical research using magicians' forces indeed shows that participants report high feelings of freedom and control over their choice, even though they ended up with the predetermined target card or object [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Moreover, when asked to explain the reason for their choice, most participants confabulated reasons which were unrelated to the influences exerted by the magician [7,9].…”
Section: Illusory Agency and Freedom In Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation