Influência do comprimento de trabalho na extrusão de detritos e hipoclorito de sódio

Watanabe, Bruna Satye Dourado; Almeida, Bruno Vila Nova de; Castro, Regina Celi Alvarenga de Moura; Brandão, Juliana Melo da Silva; Silva, Luciana Jorge Moraes

doi:10.14436/2358-2545.8.3.055-060.oar

Cited by 2 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, there were no statistically significant differences in the extrusion of debris from teeth either submitted or not submitted to IFE ( Z = 1.12/ P = 0.26). Considering the individual risk of bias of the studies – low [36] and uncertain/moderate [35,37] – the general risk was classified as being moderate (Fig. 2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the study by Watanabe et al. [37], irrigation was performed with 4 mL of 1% sodium hypochlorite every time there was a change or use of different rotary instruments (Protaper Universal system).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Watanabe et al. [37] reported the use of incisors, without mentioning the arch. The number of specimens per group was 20 [36], 15 [35] and 10 [37].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In one of the groups (G3) in the study by Watanabe et al. [37], biomechanical preparation was performed 1mm beyond the apical foramen. These data were not included in our analysis, because in the studies by Silva et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 20 remaining studies, only 4 [24,[35][36][37] were kept, based on the eligibility criteria. To conduct the metaanalysis, only 3 studies [35][36][37] were used since 1 was excluded [24] because it did not contain the necessary statistical data (Fig. 1) [42].…”

Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Extrusion of debris with and without intentional foraminal enlargement – A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review and meta-analysis was sought to assess whether intentional foraminal enlargement (IFE) is responsible for extrusion of a larger quantity of debris from extracted human teeth with fully formed apexes. Following the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis -PRISMA, electronic and manual searches were performed to identify studies that evaluated the extrusion of debris, comparing different apical limits of instrumentation (with/without IFE). The quality of the studies selected was evaluated, and statistical analysis was conducted. To perform the meta-analysis, just 3 papers could be used. The heterogeneity was high, however; there was no statistically significant difference in relation to the extrusion of debris in teeth either submitted or not submitted to IFE. The general risk of bias was moderate. In conclusion, IFE is not responsible for extrusion of a larger quantity of debris from extracted human teeth with fully formed apexes.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Watanabe et al. [37] reported the use of incisors, without mentioning the arch. The number of specimens per group was 20 [36], 15 [35] and 10 [37].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Extrusion of debris with and without intentional foraminal enlargement – A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

In vitro evaluation of filling material removal and apical debris extrusion after retreatment using Reciproc blue, Hyflex EDM and ProTaper retreatment files

Abdelnaby,

Ibrahim,

ElBackly

2023

BMC Oral Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To evaluate the amount of remaining filing material and apical debris extrusion after retreatment using Reciproc Blue, Hyflex EDM and ProTaper Retreatment Files. Materials and methods Thirty-six extracted permanent mandibular first molars with moderately curved mesial roots were selected. Mesiobuccal canals were prepared using the ProTaper Next system up to size X2 and filled using gutta-percha and Adseal sealer via cold lateral compaction. Teeth were randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 12): Group 1: Reciproc Blue (RB)(VDW, Germany), Group 2: Hyflex EDM (HEDM)(Coltene/Whaledent, Switzerland), Group 3: ProTaper Universal Retreatment file system + ProTaper Next file system (PTUR + PTN)( Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland). Eppendorf tubes were used to collect the apically extruded debris. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans were taken prior to and after retreatment and the volume of remaining filling material was assessed at the coronal, middle and apical levels. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, Friedman's test and Wilcoxon Sign Rank test. Significance level was set at p value 0.05. Results There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in the reduction of the volume of the filling material or in the amount of apically extruded debris. Conclusion All the tested filing systems showed similar efficacy in removing the filling material, however, none of them could achieve its complete removal. Apical extrusion of debris occurred with all the systems used with no significant difference between the three groups.

show abstract

Influência do comprimento de trabalho na extrusão de detritos e hipoclorito de sódio

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Extrusion of debris with and without intentional foraminal enlargement – A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Extrusion of debris with and without intentional foraminal enlargement – A systematic review and meta‐analysis

In vitro evaluation of filling material removal and apical debris extrusion after retreatment using Reciproc blue, Hyflex EDM and ProTaper retreatment files

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About