Influences on uptake of cancer screening in mental health service users: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundCancers are a leading cause of death worldwide. People with mental illness are 30 % more likely to die from cancer than the general population. One reason for this may be low uptake of nationally offered cancer screening tests by people with mental illness. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for breast, cervical and bowel cancer screening uptake by people with mental illness in order to inform interventions to promote equal access.MethodsThe interview study was conducted in both urban and rural settings. The study was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, using framework analysis and triangulation across participant groups. Participants included 45 mental health service users (service users) eligible for cancer screening, 29 mental health professionals and 11 professionals involved in cancer screening.ResultsThemes emerging from the data that affected uptake included knowledge of screening programmes by both service users and healthcare providers; knowledge of, and attitudes towards, mental illness; health service-delivery factors; service users’ beliefs and concerns about cancer screening, and practical issues. These are relevant to different stages of the screening process. Service users do not receive invitations to screening or cancer testing kits if they are admitted to hospital. They are not routinely invited for screening if they are not registered with a general practitioner (GP). Lack of integrated care means that mental health staff do not know if someone is overdue for a test and cancer screening is often not considered during health promotion. Barriers including information processing problems, the extent to which the screening process aggravates symptoms, poor staff client relationships and travel difficulties vary between individuals. Screening professionals are motivated to help, but may lack time or training to manage mental health needs. Reactive measures are available, but service users must request help which they may find difficult.ConclusionsThere are specific barriers to cancer screening uptake for mental health service users that prevent equality of care. Interventions that can be personalised are needed at individual, policy and service-delivery levels. Primary and secondary care staff and policy-makers should work together to develop an integrated approach to cancer screening in this population.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1505-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The role of service factors on variations in place of death: an observational study

“…The findings are in accordance with those of previous smaller sample studies and in studies from other care settings. [63][64][65][66][67][68] The effect size for the distance variables in this study was small overall (close to 1) compared with those reported in the other studies, probably because we adjusted for more potentially confounding variables and the interference of the other important service variables.…”

Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen‐State Interactions

“…Together with our theoretical arguments, this evidence suggests that reduced executive functioning will challenge sick people in relation to interacting with the state, which may be one explanation for empirical findings of reduced take‐up of public services and benefits among sick people. For instance, some estimates suggest that those with mental health problems are 30 percent more likely than the general public to die from cancer (Clifton et al ); lower take‐up of public screening programs is one explanation for this gap (Aggarwal, Pandurangi, and Smith ; Clifton et al ). Furthermore, studies of the Supplemental Security Income program have shown that many disabled people fail to access the program (Benitez‐Silva, Buchinsky, and Rust ), partly because the neediest eligible citizens struggle with the program's lengthy and complicated application process (Currie ), and those with severe disabilities are most affected when compliance costs increase (Deshpande and Li ).…”

Interventions to increase access to or uptake of physical health screening in people with severe mental illness: a realist review

“…In relation to cancer screening, a Cochrane review 17 found that no intervention to promote uptake has been tested in people with SMI. This is important since qualitative work 18 indicates there are specific barriers to cancer screening uptake in people with SMI and that interventions effective in the general population may not be effective in the SMI population. Furthermore, barriers to screening uptake or access may vary for different types of screening, at different stages of the screening process and between individuals.…”

“…Furthermore, barriers to screening uptake or access may vary for different types of screening, at different stages of the screening process and between individuals. 18 …”