2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of the 3D microenvironment on cancer cell behaviour and treatment responsiveness: A recent update on lung, breast and prostate cancer models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, cell models exhibited a significantly greater viability rate when cultured on 15%-PCL-ES platforms after 3 days. Pore size, surface availability, and porosity of 3D platforms as well as initial seeding cell density or time of culture, influence cell colonization [ 22 , 51 ]. The cell viability was also correlated to the protein adsorbed, which directly affected cell division [ 55 , 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, cell models exhibited a significantly greater viability rate when cultured on 15%-PCL-ES platforms after 3 days. Pore size, surface availability, and porosity of 3D platforms as well as initial seeding cell density or time of culture, influence cell colonization [ 22 , 51 ]. The cell viability was also correlated to the protein adsorbed, which directly affected cell division [ 55 , 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monolayer culture does not fully mimic the tumor microenvironment where the extracellular matrix (ECM) has an essential role in some processes, for example gene expression and drug response. At the same time, cancer cells affect ECM deposition, degradation, and remodeling, influencing tumor progression and invasiveness [ 22 ]. Although 2D cell culture is a well-established, simple, and economical method, flat surfaces alter apical-basal polarity, nutrient and oxygen distribution, soluble gradients, and cell proliferation, morphology, and interactions [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The critical role of breast TME in tumor growth and therapeutic response has been increasingly recognized, particularly as it relates to breast cancer metastatic progression. In recent years, various aspects of breast tumor TME has been extensively reviewed (Di Virgilio et al, 2018;Hamidi and Ivaska, 2018;Lim et al, 2018;Spranger and Gajewski, 2018;Costard et al, 2021), however, there is still much to be learned in our effort to develop novel therapies targeting the TME. Early stage microfluidic devices usually employ several parallel straight microchannels for easy access and imaging, therefore, is capable of studying cell migration (Wong et al, 2012), however, these devices have not been optimized for studying sophisticated interactions between tumor, endothelium, stroma, immune cells, chemokines, or cancer stem cells (Sridharan et al, 2019) observed in the complex TME.…”
Section: The Breast Tumor Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 2D studies have enabled better understanding of radiation responses of breast cancer cells, monolayer cultures are oversimplified and lack the complex 3D architecture of the TME. This would mean that they cannot recapitulate the intercellular, intracellular and cell-ECM interactions that determine the tumor growth, metastasis and response to targeted therapy [ 83 ]. Inadequacy of these models diminishes the potential of translating the findings to clinical settings.…”
Section: Current Preclinical Tools To Evaluate Effects Of Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%