2011
DOI: 10.1002/fam.1103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of specimen size and heating mode on the ignitability of polymeric materials in typical small‐scale fire test conditions

Abstract: SUMMARY Small‐scale fire tests including the Underwriters Laboratories 94 (UL94) vertical burning test and the cone calorimeter test are widely used. In this paper, the ignition times of materials heated by the conical heater of a cone calorimeter and the UL94 flame were measured. It was found that for polymer bars heated by the UL94 flame, the ignition time is relatively short and increases with the specimen thickness. But the contribution of the specimen thickness to the delay of the ignition time is limited… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LOI slightly decreased when APP was partly replaced by Ni-PO, which indicated the Ni-PO did not perform better than APP in fire inhibition under typical smallscale fire test conditions. 33 Cone calorimetry is a quantitative test method that can effectively evaluate the combustion behaviors of polymer materials under real-world fire condition. 34 Heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), smoke production rate (SPR), and total smoke production (TSP) curves for W-PLA and its composites were displayed in Figure 5, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LOI slightly decreased when APP was partly replaced by Ni-PO, which indicated the Ni-PO did not perform better than APP in fire inhibition under typical smallscale fire test conditions. 33 Cone calorimetry is a quantitative test method that can effectively evaluate the combustion behaviors of polymer materials under real-world fire condition. 34 Heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), smoke production rate (SPR), and total smoke production (TSP) curves for W-PLA and its composites were displayed in Figure 5, respectively.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cotton was ignited by the dripping of W-PLA-3 and W-PLA-5 during UL-94 test, leading to a V-2 rating for the materials. The LOI slightly decreased when APP was partly replaced by Ni-PO, which indicated the Ni-PO did not perform better than APP in fire inhibition under typical small-scale fire test conditions …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiated assessment and mechanistic aspects of burning are not considered. In the literature, some studies deal with the quantitative analysis of the testing conditions or the materials' behaviour in the UL 94 test, but more detailed or modelling approaches are rare .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coated wooden sticks were tested for their flammability performance, using a vertical burning protocol which approximates the UL‐94 method used for plastics . The wooden sticks were clamped in a metal clamp, then a blue natural gas flame measuring 20 mm was applied at a 90° angle at a distance of 10 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%