2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of Social Distancing and attachment styles on the strength of the Halo Effect

Abstract: The Halo Effect is a widely studied phenomenon that interests multiple disciplines. The relationship between Aesthetics Appearance and perceived Trustworthiness has especially gathered the attention of social scientists. While experimental works compared the strength of the Halo Effect in different situations (e.g. different genders’ faces), little is known about the stability of the Halo. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been urged to distance ourselves from others. Similar suggestions may alter the rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When faced with nancial pressure, non-basic necessities such as cigarettes may become a burden, leading individuals to quit smoking (Widome et al, 2015).Although good external family social support was found to reduce the risk of smoking, which is consistent with the ndings of previous studies, the correlation between better family social/emotional health processes, family healthy lifestyle scores, and smoking behavior was in opposite directions of in uence in different adjustment models, and the results were not stable. On the one hand, this may be due to the in uence of covariates that were not included in the control, and on the other hand, it may also be related to the dual in uence of family members' relationships, where family emotional wellness may increase acceptance of unhealthy lifestyles of family members, spouses, and elders, a phenomenon known as "love of the house," i.e., the psychological halo effect (Gabrieli et al, 2021), thus weakening criticism of their smoking behavior. Additionally, under the in uence of smoking culture in Chinese society, cigarettes are often given as gifts on important occasions (Huang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When faced with nancial pressure, non-basic necessities such as cigarettes may become a burden, leading individuals to quit smoking (Widome et al, 2015).Although good external family social support was found to reduce the risk of smoking, which is consistent with the ndings of previous studies, the correlation between better family social/emotional health processes, family healthy lifestyle scores, and smoking behavior was in opposite directions of in uence in different adjustment models, and the results were not stable. On the one hand, this may be due to the in uence of covariates that were not included in the control, and on the other hand, it may also be related to the dual in uence of family members' relationships, where family emotional wellness may increase acceptance of unhealthy lifestyles of family members, spouses, and elders, a phenomenon known as "love of the house," i.e., the psychological halo effect (Gabrieli et al, 2021), thus weakening criticism of their smoking behavior. Additionally, under the in uence of smoking culture in Chinese society, cigarettes are often given as gifts on important occasions (Huang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "what is beautiful is good" stereotype describes the tendency to attribute desirable interpersonal qualities to physically attractive individuals (Lemay et al, 2010). The "halo effect" relates to the tendency for people to have an overall positive impression of various (even unrelated) characteristics of a person based on the impression and evaluation of a single trait (Gabrieli et al, 2021). Neuroscience also provides a plethora of studies that elucidate the neural mechanisms of the "beauty-is-good" stereotype from its perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors like people's cognitive load, attentional capacity, and processing goals might all modulate the strength of the in-group bias and the subsequent activation and application of stereotyped knowledge [28][29][30][31][32]. Even task characteristics modulate social categorization [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%