Influences of service characteristics and older people’s attributes on outcomes from direct payments

Abstract

Background Direct payments (DPs) are cash-payments that eligible individuals can receive to purchase care services by themselves. DPs are central to current social care policy in England, but their advantages remain controversial. This controversy is partly due to their lack of historical visibility: DPs were deployed in stages, bundled with other policy instruments (first individual budgets, then personal budgets), and amidst increasing budgetary constraints. As a result, little unequivocal evidence is available about the effectiveness of DPs as an instrument for older people’s care. This study aims to partially fill that gap using data obtained during an early evaluation of DP’s that took place between 2005 and 07. Methods Semi-structured 81 face-to-face interviews with older people (and their proxies) using DPs are analyzed. DPs contribution to outcomes was measured using a standardized utility scale. Data on individual characteristics (dependency, informal support) and received services (types and amount of services) was also gathered. Multiple regression analyses were performed between measured outcome gains and individual and service characteristics. A Poisson log-functional form was selected to account for the low mean and positive skew of outcome gains. Results Levels of met need compared very favorably to average social care outcomes in the domains of social participation, control over daily living and safety, and user satisfaction was high. Benefit from DPs was particularly affected by the role and function of unpaid care and availability of recruitment support. The freedom to combine funded care packages with self-funded care enhanced the positive impact of the former. The ability to purchase care that deviated from standardized care inputs improved service benefits. Large discrepancies between total care input and that supported through DPs negatively affected outcomes. Conclusions The results offer clarity regarding the benefit derived from receiving DPs. They also clarify contested aspects of the policy such as the influence of unpaid care, types of care received, funding levels and the role of wider support arrangements. Tangible benefits may results from direct payments but those benefits are highly dependent on policy implementation practices. Implementation of DPs should pay special attention to the balance between DP funded care and unpaid care.

Mortality attributable to COVID-19 in nursing home residents: a retrospective study

“…Unfortunately, these epidemiological information are not available for NH people, a setting in which COVID-19 is a widespread condition, as mentioned before [ 14 ]. Moreover, the data available so far have shown the importance of frailty for prognosis in older people having COVID-19 [ 15 – 17 ], but these data are mainly based on community-dwelling and hospitalized older people and not in NHs [ 18 – 20 ].…”

Promoting Generalized Learning in Balance Recovery Interventions

“…In PBT, the notion of a ‘challenge’ can be framed in several ways. This includes manipulating training factors such as (a) the parameters of the perturbation, (b) the complexity of the environment in which responses must be made, and (c) multi-tasking (both motor and cognitive) [ 33 , 65 , 66 ]. From these factors, the challenge can be increased, for example, by gradually imposing a larger perturbation over time.…”

“…Similar to any motor skill training program, there are key elements that contribute to outcome success. The initial level of PBT challenge should be tailored to the individual through baseline assessment, and then challenge of the task can be adjusted to keep pace with an individual’s progress [ 33 , 65 , 66 ]. To maximize participant adherence and engagement, training must be challenging, but also motivating and enjoyable [ 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ].…”

Differences in the Effect of Sleep Deprivation on the Postural Stability among Men and Women

“…With increasing age, there is a higher probability for developing specific changes. Based on the available results, it can be concluded that postural impairments are more noticeable in older groups compared to younger participants [ 5 , 6 ].…”