Influences of nationality and national identification on perceived dangerousness of COVID-19 variants and perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: A study of UK and Portuguese samples

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, both variants of the virus that causes the disease and vaccines developed to combat it have been identified with nationalities. Both social identity theory and identity process theory would predict that this would initiate intergroup differentiation processes aimed at optimizing ingroup value and personal identity enhancement. Our study examined whether people’s nationality and level of national identification influence their perception of dangerousness of variants and effectiveness of vaccines. We compared data collected by online survey in March 2021 from the UK (which was associated with both a variant and a vaccine) and Portugal (which was associated with neither). The Portuguese rated variants overall as more dangerous than did the UK sample. The Chinese variant was rated by both samples as the least dangerous and the UK sample rated the British variant as less dangerous than did the Portuguese. Higher national identification in the UK sample was associated with differentiating more between the British variant and the South African variant and differentiating it less from the Chinese variant. The UK sample rated the effectiveness of the British vaccine higher than did the Portuguese. They also evaluated it as more effective than the American, Chinese and Indian vaccines. In both samples, higher national identification was associated with lower ratings of effectiveness for vaccines originating in China or India. Our study suggests that identity processes associated with national identification do influence perceptions of vaccines and variants. This has significant practice and policy implications. Social representations of variants and vaccines in nationalistic terms can have complex and unexpected consequences.

Public uncertainties in relation to COVID-19 vaccines in the United Kingdom

“…Although our study focused upon the United Kingdom, it should be noted that that uncertainties do not respect national borders, so policymakers should work together internationally to address uncertainties. The international decision to shift categorisation of COVID-19 variants from country names to letters of the Greek alphabet was an example of this (Breakwell et al 2022). The mass media and the social representations that they disseminate operate across geographical, cultural and linguistic boundaries.…”

Mobilising ideas in the COVID-19 pandemic: Anti-lockdown actions and the Identity-Deprivation-Efficacy-Action-Subjective well-being model

“…For example, anti-mask and anti-vaccine attitudes are positively correlated and underpinned by similar concerns (a general "aversion to mandates", Martin & Vanderslott, 2022). As a result, we would expect that the predictors of collective action highlighted in the IDEAS model might also influence other attitudes (Breakwell et al, 2022) and behaviours, including the adoption of health-protection behaviour, respect for social distancing measures, and vaccine hesitancy. Future research should test further how collective action and personal behaviour are intertwined, and what role psychological variables, most notably grievances and perceived deprivation, play for both.…”

Community-oriented Motivational Interviewing (MI): A novel framework extending MI to address COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in online social media platforms

“…Identity process theory has been applied to understand COVID-19 prevention behaviors ( Jaspal & Nerlich, 2020 ). It has also been used to conceptualize how health risks are processed with reference to whether they affirm or conflict with one's identity ( Breakwell & Jaspal et al, 2022 ). While it may initially seem irrational to voluntarily incur greater risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19, identity process theory would suggest that motivation to do so might arise from social representations of vaccination that have taken on political and identity-related connotations.…”