1995
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)00093-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of housing conditions and ethanol intake on binding characteristics of D2, 5-HT1A, and benzodiazepine receptors of rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest that exposure to environmental variables associated with the attainment of dominance produced alterations in D 2 receptor levels that impacted the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Consistent with these findings in monkeys, others have reported similar alterations in the physiology of brain DA systems in rats raised in social groups ("enriched" environments) versus those that were individually housed ("isolated"; Bowling et al 1993;Rilke et al 1995Rilke et al , 1998. Moreover, "enriched" rodents are less sensitive to the behavioral effects of cocaine and amphetamine, including locomotor-stimulant (Bardo et al 1995), discriminative stimulus (Fowler et al 1993) and reinforcing effects (Green et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…These findings suggest that exposure to environmental variables associated with the attainment of dominance produced alterations in D 2 receptor levels that impacted the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Consistent with these findings in monkeys, others have reported similar alterations in the physiology of brain DA systems in rats raised in social groups ("enriched" environments) versus those that were individually housed ("isolated"; Bowling et al 1993;Rilke et al 1995Rilke et al , 1998. Moreover, "enriched" rodents are less sensitive to the behavioral effects of cocaine and amphetamine, including locomotor-stimulant (Bardo et al 1995), discriminative stimulus (Fowler et al 1993) and reinforcing effects (Green et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore, we selected subjects who met these criteria for our study. Of course, this reasoning also suggests that the population of individuals with a positive family history and who are alcoholic themselves may lack protective factors, but we did not select this group as a comparison because long-term alcohol use can alter striatal D 2 receptor expression, 26 which would interfere with the identification of variables that protect against alcoholism.…”
Section: G Enetic Factors Have Amentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, no differences in D1-like and D2-like DA receptor density were found between isolated animals, group-housed animals, and animals that were raised in a enriched conditions between 30 and 60 days of age (Bardo & Hammer, 1991). Other studies showed reduced D1-like and D2-like DA receptor density in the striatum and nucleus accumbens of isolated animals (Rilke et al, 1995;Bean & Lee, 1991). Moreover, the downregulation of D2-like DA receptors was blocked by chronic haloperidol treatment (Bean & Lee, 1991).…”
Section: Dopamine Function In Socially and Maternally Deprived Animalsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, isolated rats was shown to acquire sensitization to amphetamine at a lower dose than that of animals that have been raised in groups; the behavioral response to amphetamine following a stressor (footshock) was also higher in isolated animals (Ahmed et al, 1995). Then, other studies reported no change in DA receptor affinity following prolonged social deprivation Rilke, May, Oehler, & Wolffgramm, 1995;Guisado, Fernandez-Tome, Garzon, & Del Rio, 1980). Furthermore, no differences in the effects of D 1 (SKF 38393) and D 2 (quinpirole) DA agonists on cyclic AMP accumulation in the caudate-putamen was found following isolation (Jones et al, 1992).…”
Section: Dopamine Function In Socially and Maternally Deprived Animalsmentioning
confidence: 89%