2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of food particle size on growth, size heterogeneity, food intake and gastric evacuation in juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, L., 1758

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to radiography studies used effectively on fish to determine gut transit times or GIE times (Jobling, 1987;Jobling et al, 1977;Tablot and Higgins, 1983) and feed intake (Azaza et al, 2010;Hossain et al, 1998;Palson et al, 1992), the use of radiography as a method to determine both GIE time and feed intake in greenlip abalone in this study was not effective. The reason radiography was not effective in greenlip abalone was most likely due to differential rate of movement of Ballotini balls in comparison to feed through the gastrointestinal tract.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…In contrast to radiography studies used effectively on fish to determine gut transit times or GIE times (Jobling, 1987;Jobling et al, 1977;Tablot and Higgins, 1983) and feed intake (Azaza et al, 2010;Hossain et al, 1998;Palson et al, 1992), the use of radiography as a method to determine both GIE time and feed intake in greenlip abalone in this study was not effective. The reason radiography was not effective in greenlip abalone was most likely due to differential rate of movement of Ballotini balls in comparison to feed through the gastrointestinal tract.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…4), implying that the growth penalty for consuming prey n% smaller than DM opt was more severe than for prey n% larger than DM opt . Similar asymmetric dome-shaped patterns have been documented in studies on the effect of pellet diameter on fish growth (e.g., Tabachek 1988;Hossain et al 2000;Azaza et al 2010). This asymmetric shape can be accounted for by the allometric scaling of food particle volumes, surfaces and diameters, which intimately govern their energy content, digestibility and detectability (or escape capacities for a live prey), respectively.…”
Section: Size-dependent Variations Of Optimal Prey Size (Dm Topt )mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…A similar interest has been raised in aquacultural studies aiming to understand the relative benefits of using a small or large food particle size (for fishes: Wankowski and Thorpe 1979;Goldan et al 1997;Hasan and Macintosh 2008;Azaza et al 2010). Small prey are more difficult to detect at long distance (Folkvord 1997), but easier to capture and handle (Knights 1983;Mittelbach and Persson 1998), and unless their gut residence time is excessively brief (Hossain et al 2000) they can be digested more completely (Persson 1986;Jobling 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aquaculture, as in any type of animal husbandry, it is preferable to reduce animal size variations to produce a homogeneous animal size as that would facilitate feeding (Azaza et al, 2010a), harvesting, marketing and processing. As the majority of farmed fish, Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. reared in groups, exhibit a strong inter-individual growth rate, leading the farmers to grade their fish several times during the production cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%