2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05728-1_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencer Authenticity – Conceptualization, Nature and Nomological Role

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to recent works, which conceptualize influencer authenticity as strongly dependent on the style of communication an influencer endorses a brand with (Audrezet et al, 2020), we define influencer authenticity as a personality characteristic or general nature of an influencer. This nature is naturally mirrored by the perceivable characteristics of his/her social media account and the associated information on his/her person (identifiable in the profile description) and his/her popularity (described by the number of followers or likes) (Lindmoser et al, 2022). Hence, we do not focus on self-determination theory and on whether the influencer perceives himself/herself as authentic.…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to recent works, which conceptualize influencer authenticity as strongly dependent on the style of communication an influencer endorses a brand with (Audrezet et al, 2020), we define influencer authenticity as a personality characteristic or general nature of an influencer. This nature is naturally mirrored by the perceivable characteristics of his/her social media account and the associated information on his/her person (identifiable in the profile description) and his/her popularity (described by the number of followers or likes) (Lindmoser et al, 2022). Hence, we do not focus on self-determination theory and on whether the influencer perceives himself/herself as authentic.…”
Section: Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authenticity is not defined in the article; nor does a unified definition exist in medicine or psychology more generally, but we take it to characterise the means through which interaction between a communicator and a recipient induces feelings that the communicator is genuine in their messaging. 4 In an online space there is no contemporaneous interaction between participants, making authenticity harder to assess. Given the one-way delivery of information, online viewers of information likely consider and perceive authenticity in a very different way than they would if they were in the same room as the person providing the information.…”
Section: It Is In Relation Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Focus on mistakes can lead learners to avoid challenges, instead of embracing a growth mindset, in which errors are seen as areas of development (rather than evidence of failure). 4 As a group, medical students rate highly in perfectionism, which (when maladaptive) includes a propensity to focus on mistakes, a tendency that may increase in medical school.…”
Section: Author Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation