Influence tactics and “second-order” change in schools: case study research of principals' political behaviors and strategies

Abstract

PurposePrincipals are considered central in initiating and mobilizing changes in schools; however, their political behaviors in the course of school changes are underexplored. The present research investigated the influence tactics used by school principals to induce teachers to join a process of second-order (deep and wide) change in the school teaching and culture. In specific, the authors were interested to know which influence tactics, principals and staff members considered to be efficient during such a second-order change process.Design/methodology/approachThe study was based on a case study method focusing on four Israeli Jewish state public religious schools participating in the “Routes” program aimed at strengthening religious values in schools. Data collection included semi-structured interviews with principals, teachers with program coordinators responsibilities and teachers in four schools.FindingsThe results indicate that school principals who are considered successful in leading changes display two key influence prototypes: a hybrid type that combines soft and hard influence tactics and a unitype that relies on soft influence tactics.Originality/valueThe research study contributed to the limited knowledge in educational administration on micropolitics and political behaviors in the course of school changes.

Cultural dimensions as key aspects to change and improve school performance: a qualitative study in the Brazilian public schools

“…However, organizational culture of municipal public schools influences the results, performance and student learning (Lück, 2009), given that it is able to drive change and guide the school in its strategy, defining the structure, priorities, use of resources and decisions to be taken (Gunbayi, 2011; Chu, 2016; Destler, 2016; Friedman and Berkovich, 2020; Pavlidou and Efstathiades, 2021).…”

“…These activities are developed based on learning experiences and a school environment conducive to the principles and objectives of education bound through an intimate cultural relationship, thus influencing as well as being influenced by it. As such, school management activities occur in a collective manner, where it is of paramount importance to understand how these changes occur in these organizations (Friedman and Berkovich, 2020; Pavlidou and Efstathiades, 2021; Oliveira et al ., 2023).…”

A “cracking” school culture: leading resource exploitation during implementation of a national reform

“…Strong transformational leaders motivate their followers to achieve more than originally planned through a respectful and motivational environment, one that encourages innovative behavior (Jaiswal and Dhar, 2015; Sethibe and Steyn, 2018). The principals used soft-influence tactics like power-sharing to lead and deeply assimilate changes (Friedman and Berkovich, 2021). This is a key factor in increasing productivity and in creating a sense of value and support among staff.…”

Transformative leadership conversation: a conceptualization and empirical test of its function

“…In these places, transformation is not led by passing a policy, changing the curriculum or adopting a program. Instead, transformation emerges as individuals and groups work through numerous tensions associated with establishing new ways of being (Friedman and Berkovich, 2021;Sawyer, 2015). For educators JEA 61,5 and communities who are re-imagining teaching and learning, re-framing discipline, re-thinking learning spaces and re-defining schooling, these aspirational realities call for transformation, not first-order changes.…”

“…Second-order change may be difficult to see at a systems or institutional level because a macro-view obscures many transformations taking place in classrooms, schools and even school systems (Friedman and Berkovich, 2021). In these places, transformation is not led by passing a policy, changing the curriculum or adopting a program.…”