2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ZrO2 and WO3 doping additives on the thermal properties of porous mullite ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the CTE values of mullite ceramics produced from the industrial wastes ranged from 5.6 to 6.1 × 10 −6 • C −1 . Their values were slightly higher than those of mullite ceramics produced from minerals, which range from 5.0 to 5.7 × 10 −6 • C −1 [46][47][48], the CTE of commercial mullite of 5.5 × 10 −6 • C −1 [49]. Table 4.…”
Section: Thermal Expansionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results showed that the CTE values of mullite ceramics produced from the industrial wastes ranged from 5.6 to 6.1 × 10 −6 • C −1 . Their values were slightly higher than those of mullite ceramics produced from minerals, which range from 5.0 to 5.7 × 10 −6 • C −1 [46][47][48], the CTE of commercial mullite of 5.5 × 10 −6 • C −1 [49]. Table 4.…”
Section: Thermal Expansionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Raw Materials Type of Raw Materials Ceramics Product CTE (× 10 −6 • C −1 )/Temperature Range [5] aluminum sludge + ceramic raw materials Industrial wastes mullite 5.6/20-800 • C [16] coal fly ash + Al dross Industrial wastes mullite 5.8/30-1000 • C [18] coal fly ash + bauxite Industrial wastes porous mullite 6.1/26-1000 • C [23] coal fly ash + bauxite Industrial wastes mullite 5.9/26-1550 • C [46] drift sand + alumina minerals mullite 5.5/30-900 • C [47] alumina + silica + kaolin minerals porous mullite 5.6/200-900 • C [48] ball clay + alumina + kaolin minerals Mullite/alumina 5.0-5.7/400-1200 • C [49] commercial mullite (Duramul 325F) Laboratory grade chemicals Porous mullite 5.5/30-1200 • C…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For porous materials, thermal conductivity usually increases as porous decreases. 25 In addition, the thermal conductivity of mullite (5.45 W/(m•K)) was significantly higher than that of anorthite (3.67 W/(m•K)). Although the thermal conductivity enlarged to 0.065 W/m•K when mullite content increased to 60 mol%, the value was much lower than that of composites materials from in situ synthesis process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This might be explained by the thermal conduction mechanism in porous ceramics. First of all, the thermal conductivity of gas phase in the pores was negligible compared to the solid phases at room temperature, thus, the increasing of volume fractions of pores can significantly reduce thermal conductivity . Thermal energy in most ceramics was transported by lattice vibrations (phonons).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%