2004
DOI: 10.1002/we.138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of wave modelling on the prediction of fatigue for offshore wind turbines

Abstract: Currently it is standard practice to use Airy linear wave theory combined with Morison's formula for the calculation of fatigue loads for offshore wind turbines. However, offshore wind turbines are typically placed in relatively shallow water depths of 5-25 m where linear wave theory has limited accuracy and where ideally waves generated with the Navier-Stokes approach should be used.This article examines the differences in fatigue for some representative offshore wind turbines that are found if first-order, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by DNV estimates a fatigue damage increase of 7.5% on the foundation with second‐order wave models using a Wöhler exponent of 5. In another paper, Veldkamp and van der Tempel found that the fatigue damage increase using more sophisticated models of wave kinematics is about 5–10%, and they concluded it is ‘on the threshold of significance’. The force exerted by the waves on the support structure is estimated by Morison's equation: dFT(),zt=dFD(),zt+dFI(),zt=12ρwDPCDu(),zt||u(),zt+CmρwAPtrueu˙(),zt where dF T , dF D and dF I are the total wave force, the drag force and the inertia force per length, respectively; C D is the drag coefficient of the support structure with suggested values between 0.7 and 1.2; C m = 1 + C a is the inertia coefficient with suggested values between 1.5 and 2; C a is the added mass coefficient, ρ w is the density of water, D P is the diameter of the monopile/substructure and AP=DP2πtrue/4 is the cross‐sectional area of the pile (more precisely, the area of the outer circle).…”
Section: Complexity Of Loading and Bending Moment Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by DNV estimates a fatigue damage increase of 7.5% on the foundation with second‐order wave models using a Wöhler exponent of 5. In another paper, Veldkamp and van der Tempel found that the fatigue damage increase using more sophisticated models of wave kinematics is about 5–10%, and they concluded it is ‘on the threshold of significance’. The force exerted by the waves on the support structure is estimated by Morison's equation: dFT(),zt=dFD(),zt+dFI(),zt=12ρwDPCDu(),zt||u(),zt+CmρwAPtrueu˙(),zt where dF T , dF D and dF I are the total wave force, the drag force and the inertia force per length, respectively; C D is the drag coefficient of the support structure with suggested values between 0.7 and 1.2; C m = 1 + C a is the inertia coefficient with suggested values between 1.5 and 2; C a is the added mass coefficient, ρ w is the density of water, D P is the diameter of the monopile/substructure and AP=DP2πtrue/4 is the cross‐sectional area of the pile (more precisely, the area of the outer circle).…”
Section: Complexity Of Loading and Bending Moment Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morrison's equation is the sum of two force components: an inertia force in phase with the local flow acceleration and a drag force proportional to the square of the instantaneous flow velocity. According to Veldkamp and Van Der Tempel, 16 the inertia component is dominant for offshore wind turbine support structures with the currently characteristic diameter of 3-5 m in intermediate water depths of 5-25 m. Several empirical calculation methods exist to find the appropriate inertia (C m ) and drag (C d ) coefficients. For random wave fields used in fatigue calculations, the design rules advise, for a vertical cylinder following coefficients, C m D 2.0 and C d D 0.65.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Veldkamp and van der Tempel [17] investigated the sensitivity of fatigue loads for a monopile-supported offshore wind turbine to three factors: (i) the shape of the wave spectrum; (ii) assumed wave kinematics models arising from first-order, second-order and nonlinear theories; and (iii) inertia and drag coefficients used with Morison's equation. The main conclusions from that study were that, for the selected site-specific data set, the JONSWAP spectrum provided an acceptable representation of the actual wave conditions at least for loads associated with the dominant (first-order) wave frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the calibration of the inertial term in Morison's equation, the authors concluded that a value of 2 appeared to be the best choice for the Keulegan-Carpenter (KC) number considered. While on (i) and (ii), Veldkamp and van der Tempel [17] provided qualitative and quantitative results, on (ii) actual fatigue loads associated with the different wave models were not computed. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%