2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.104419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vortex domain walls on magnetoresistance signals in Permalloy rings

Abstract: The magnetization reversal and the corresponding magnetoresistance of Permalloy rings are investigated here both numerically and experimentally. Micromagnetic simulations reveal that during the reversal process there exist three intermediate metastable states which lead to an unconventional triple-switching characteristic. Size effects are studied as well. The simulation results are in good agreement with our magnetoresistance measurements. Significant differences in the magnetoresistance at two orthogonal dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The external fields corresponding to the aforementioned magnetization configurations have a good agreement with those measured for the MR curves based on the AMR effect, as argued in our previous paper [4]. In comparison to the resistance drop due to vortex pair formation, as shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3. The external fields corresponding to the aforementioned magnetization configurations have a good agreement with those measured for the MR curves based on the AMR effect, as argued in our previous paper [4]. In comparison to the resistance drop due to vortex pair formation, as shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…The nonmagnetic gold leads shunt the segment of the permalloy ring underneath. These phenomena were indeed further identified with the transverse MR measurements, where vortex domain wall structures formed in the opposite ends encounter no gold leads, thus giving rise to no resistance drops at the transition fields, as shown elsewhere [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The initiation of the reversal of M appeared to take place by the generation of domains in some sections of the ring and not by the depinning and movement of the DWs, as was observed in rings with circumferential magnetization that exhibit onion and vortex states. [11][12][13] For H = 16.7 kA/m, the domains parallel to the field were enlarged by movement of domain walls and, at 32 kA/m, the inversion of the polarity of M was nearly complete. The fact that the polarity of the contrast of the ring followed the field direction suggests that the tip magnetization was maintained perpendicular to H and was not demagnetized during the measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%