1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0176-1617(11)80848-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza on phytohormone balances in maize (Zea mays L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
0
7

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
80
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that AM root systems either scavenge water of low activity more effectively [a finding also implicated by Bethlenfalvay et al (1988b)] or contribute to so-called nonhydraulic root-to-shoot communication (Davies et al 1994) differently than nonAM root systems. Mycorrhizal symbiosis has modified host hormonal relations Danneberg et al 1992;Goicoechea et al 1997a;Nikolaou et al 2003), and we investigated the possibility that mycorrhizal fungi, which are confined to outer root tissues, were affecting distant organs like leaf stomata by changing the hormonal flow of information from roots to shoots in the transpiration stream. Working with maize, sorghum and cowpea, we did not observe much effect of mycorrhizal symbiosis on g s or plant water relations under conditions where strictly nonhydraulic signaling of soil drying prevailed Ebel et al 1994;Augé et al 1995).…”
Section: Mycorrhizae and Plant Water Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that AM root systems either scavenge water of low activity more effectively [a finding also implicated by Bethlenfalvay et al (1988b)] or contribute to so-called nonhydraulic root-to-shoot communication (Davies et al 1994) differently than nonAM root systems. Mycorrhizal symbiosis has modified host hormonal relations Danneberg et al 1992;Goicoechea et al 1997a;Nikolaou et al 2003), and we investigated the possibility that mycorrhizal fungi, which are confined to outer root tissues, were affecting distant organs like leaf stomata by changing the hormonal flow of information from roots to shoots in the transpiration stream. Working with maize, sorghum and cowpea, we did not observe much effect of mycorrhizal symbiosis on g s or plant water relations under conditions where strictly nonhydraulic signaling of soil drying prevailed Ebel et al 1994;Augé et al 1995).…”
Section: Mycorrhizae and Plant Water Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induction of resistance is realized in two ways: first, via a limitation of the absorption of Na and Cl ions from the circulating solution, lowering their intake to levels tolerable for the plant, which is performed by the fungus (Al- Karaki andHammad 2001, Mohammad et al 2003); second, through a general amelioration of the nutritional status by means of a better bal-ance of the intake of more and less available ions (Graham 1986). Other authors show how mycorrhizal fungi can improve the resistance to salinity by influencing the hormonal equilibrium of the plant (Danneberg et al 1992), enhancing water uptake (Ruiz-Lozano and Azcón 1995), stimulating photosynthetic activity (Augè and Stodola 1990) and proline accumulation in the cytoplasm .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such changes in morphology are expected to be under phytohormonal control (Selvaraj, 1998). Abscisic acid (ABA) was found to be considerably enhanced in both roots and shoots of AM plants as compared with nonmycorrhizal control (Danneberg, 1992). Also, an increase in Indole Acetic Acid (IAA), gibberellin and cytokinin level was observed in G. fasciculatum-inoculated P. juliflora recorded by Selvaraj (1998), showed the influence of the AM fungi, G. fasciculatum, on increased level of growth hormones.…”
Section: Miscellaneous Roles Of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (Am) Fungimentioning
confidence: 88%