2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-016-4094-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vegetation cover and other sources of variability on sediment and runoff response in a burned forest in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to investigate the speed, stability, and complexity of ecological restoration via artificial plants compared with natural desert plants, especially for the revival of sand dune ecosystems (Nicoll, 1996;Moulton et al, 2018). At present, evaluation of the ecological restoration effect of sand-fixing plants is mostly focused on the adaptability and endurance of the artificially planted species for aeolian processes and soil environments (Li et al, 2013;Ewane and Lee, 2017). Furthermore, selection of afforestation species and evaluation of their protective effects are thought to be dependent on the characteristics of aeolian activity in forests and changes to the ecological factors (Arens, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to investigate the speed, stability, and complexity of ecological restoration via artificial plants compared with natural desert plants, especially for the revival of sand dune ecosystems (Nicoll, 1996;Moulton et al, 2018). At present, evaluation of the ecological restoration effect of sand-fixing plants is mostly focused on the adaptability and endurance of the artificially planted species for aeolian processes and soil environments (Li et al, 2013;Ewane and Lee, 2017). Furthermore, selection of afforestation species and evaluation of their protective effects are thought to be dependent on the characteristics of aeolian activity in forests and changes to the ecological factors (Arens, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%