2009
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181958b1c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of vasopressor agent in septic shock mortality. Results from the Portuguese Community-Acquired Sepsis Study (SACiUCI study)*

Abstract: In patients with community-acquired septic shock, our data suggest that norepinephrine administration could be associated with worse outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The RCT with only septic shock patients demonstrated a mortality benefit in favor of norepinephrine. 48 In contrast, a recent large cohort study suggested higher mortality in patients treated with norepinephrine. This is contrasted by observational studies that demonstrated higher mortality in patients with septic shock who were treated with dopamine.…”
Section: Question 5: Which Vasopressors and Inotropes Should Be Used mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The RCT with only septic shock patients demonstrated a mortality benefit in favor of norepinephrine. 48 In contrast, a recent large cohort study suggested higher mortality in patients treated with norepinephrine. This is contrasted by observational studies that demonstrated higher mortality in patients with septic shock who were treated with dopamine.…”
Section: Question 5: Which Vasopressors and Inotropes Should Be Used mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Adult studies have also identified that high doses of vasoactive drugs are associated with poor outcome [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many intensivists do not use doses greater than 100 µg/min or 1.2 µg/kg per minute. 2,5,8,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Indeed, use of high doses may be futile (ie, associated with 100% mortality), as reported previously, [17][18][19]21 but currently the indicators for futility of this rescue treatment are unknown. They may vary according to underlying disease, causes of shock, and other factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…27 Our patients had severe illnesses, and about 40% of nonsurvivors had septic shock. Other investigators 3,5,6,8,9,13,14,[16][17][18][19][21][22][23] have reported an ICU mortality rate of about 40% to 50% or greater associated survival is possible. Although neither dose and duration of norepinephrine treatment nor cause of shock contributed to prediction of death, the highdose treatment appeared futile (100% mortality) if associated with an APACHE II score greater than 40, a bicarbonate level less than 9.0 mEq/L, or an epinephrine dose of 0.25 µg/kg per minute or greater at the time of admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%