1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01699212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of variations in culture medium on the survival and reproduction ofDaphnia magna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data agree with those of other investigators, who also obtained better performance of cladocerans' lifehistories when animals were cultured in natural water compared with artificial media, such as American Society for Testing and Materials hard water (Abrantes and Gonçalves 2003) and USEPA reconstituted water (the same used in the present research) (Girling and Garforth 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The present data agree with those of other investigators, who also obtained better performance of cladocerans' lifehistories when animals were cultured in natural water compared with artificial media, such as American Society for Testing and Materials hard water (Abrantes and Gonçalves 2003) and USEPA reconstituted water (the same used in the present research) (Girling and Garforth 1989).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Each of these modifying factors can affect an organism's response to toxicants. For example, differences in diet [34][35][36][37][38][39][40], temperature [30,41], and water quality [42][43][44] can affect the results of toxicity tests with daphnids. Such is also the case for other organisms.…”
Section: Laboratory Versus Receiving Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually most protocols suggesting D. magna as test organism do not consider important sources of variation in the production of neonates, such as feeding conditions of the progenitors (Enserink et al 1990), or the use of different culture media (Girling and Garforth 1989;Baer et al 1999). Enserink et al (1993) suggest that standardization in the food concentrations supplied to reproducers leads to test organisms that are more constant in their toxic response, reducing the inter-and intra-laboratories variability and increasing the reproducibility of results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%