1999
DOI: 10.4141/s97-049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of urea fertilization and urease inhibitor on the size and activity of the soil microbial biomass under conventional and zero tillage at two sites

Abstract: Fertilizers are frequently used in agriculture to enhance crop yield and quality. Increasingly, microbial and enzyme inhibitors are being used to enhance the efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen use. The assumption being made is that the impact of these compounds is short-term or localized and thus does not adversely impact soil quality. This study investigates the implications of urea fertilizer with and without urease inhibitor [N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide, NBPT], conventional and zero tillage systems, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in soil microbial biomass C by depth is more pronounced between the first and second layer, especially under no tillage, probably because of surface deposition of crop residue and shallow root growth. The depth variation in microbial biomass could be associated with C stratification because others have found a strong link between them (Carter 1986;Doran 1987;Banerjee, Burton, and Grant 1999). Results confirmed a strong relationship between SOC and microbial biomass C with a correlation coefficient of 0.86 over all treatments and depths (data not shown).…”
Section: Microbial Biomass Carbonsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decrease in soil microbial biomass C by depth is more pronounced between the first and second layer, especially under no tillage, probably because of surface deposition of crop residue and shallow root growth. The depth variation in microbial biomass could be associated with C stratification because others have found a strong link between them (Carter 1986;Doran 1987;Banerjee, Burton, and Grant 1999). Results confirmed a strong relationship between SOC and microbial biomass C with a correlation coefficient of 0.86 over all treatments and depths (data not shown).…”
Section: Microbial Biomass Carbonsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Anderson and Domsch (1989) suggest that a more diversified microorganism community and larger population are expected under polyculture systems. Furthermore, long-term monocropping under intensive tillage depleted soil organic matter, which could be favorable to rapid organic matter accumulation and increases in soil microbial biomass C. Another factor that could also contribute to a large increase in soil microbial biomass was the clayey soil texture, which also provides favorable conditions for SOC improvement and consequent increased soil microbial biomass (Powlson and Brookes 1987;Banerjee, Burton, and Grant 1999).…”
Section: Microbial Biomass Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier study concluded that the addition of urea alone or urea with NBPT did not affect the biological properties (microbial biomass C?N content and content of arylsulfarase, acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase) of the test soil over a period of 1 year and 8 months (Banerjee et al 1999). Further studies of both the long-and short-term effects of NBPT (and other urease inhibitors) on crops/plants and the soil microbiome are obviously still needed.…”
Section: Ammonia Emission Mitigation By Urease Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil microbial communities are involved in many important soil biological processes like organic matter degradation, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem function (Lupwayi et al, 2017). At low dosages (such as 50 kg N ha À1 ), N fertilization did not affect soil microbial biomass carbon and activities (Banerjee et al, 1999). At higher N dosages (like 400 kg N ha À1 ), the functional diversity of soil bacteria decreased (Sarathchandra et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%