2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Under Sleeper Pads on Ballast Behavior Under Cyclic Loading: Experimental and Numerical Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that the CR can induce insufficiently soft contacts between the sleeper and RPB particles, which has been proved in [54], where the soft contacts led to higher sleeper accelerations. However, in some earlier studies on the under sleeper pads (USPs) [21,22,55], they argued that the soft contacts can provide a better ballast bed performance by reducing the ballast degradation. Particularly, the difference between the USPs and RPB is that the USPs attach to the sleeper bottom without any movement and the ballast particles' rearrangement is slow, whereas RPB particles can move randomly after applied loadings and the interaction between particles is not strong enough to restrict RPB particles.…”
Section: Contact Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that the CR can induce insufficiently soft contacts between the sleeper and RPB particles, which has been proved in [54], where the soft contacts led to higher sleeper accelerations. However, in some earlier studies on the under sleeper pads (USPs) [21,22,55], they argued that the soft contacts can provide a better ballast bed performance by reducing the ballast degradation. Particularly, the difference between the USPs and RPB is that the USPs attach to the sleeper bottom without any movement and the ballast particles' rearrangement is slow, whereas RPB particles can move randomly after applied loadings and the interaction between particles is not strong enough to restrict RPB particles.…”
Section: Contact Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deterioration (breakage) of ballast is one of the major contributing factors which affect the stability and longevity of railway foundations (Tutumluer et al 2012;Sun et al 2018;Le Pen et al 2011;Ngo et al 2017). The adoption of various forms of geosynthetic inclusions, such as geogrids and rubber energy absorbing drainage sheets (READS) produced from recycled tires to reduce the plastic deformation and breakage of ballast has become increasingly popular worldwide (Navaratnarajah et al 2018;Abadi et al 2019;Indraratna et al 2016). These synthetic inclusions eliminate hard interfaces between ballast aggregates and concrete sleepers or the underlying formation soils, and allow the aggregates to bed into the relatively softer pads, thus increasing the contact surface area of the ballast and reducing ballast stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These impact forces can likewise be generated at transition zones involving abrupt variations of vertical track stiffness, such as at the approaches to tunnels, bridge or viaduct and level crossings, or where there is a sudden change from conventional ballast to slab track intensifying ballast breakage and adversely affecting track stability [11][12][13][14][15]. One potential method of enhancing the substructure capacity to withstand the large cyclic and impact loads induced by fast-moving heavy-haul trains is to improve the performance of the ballast layer using plastic (e.g., geogrids) and rubber inclusions (e.g., rubber mat, tire cell, and rubber crumbs) [2,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high damping properties of rubber materials have made them a promising inclusion for rail track as to enhance the energy absorbing characteristics of rail tracks, as well as reduce noise, vibration, ballast degradation and impact damage to track components [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Since these rubber materials can be made from end-of-life tires, they are environmentally friendly and economically attractive, promoting optimism and exploration into the potential use of rubber materials in rail foundations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%