Influence of Type I Collagen Surface Density on Fibroblast Spreading, Motility, and Contractility

Abstract

We examine the relationships of three variables (projected area, migration speed, and traction force) at various type I collagen surface densities in a population of fibroblasts. We observe that cell area is initially an increasing function of ligand density, but that above a certain transition level, increases in surface collagen cause cell area to decline. The threshold collagen density that separates these two qualitatively different regimes, approximately 160 molecules/ microm(2), is approximately equal to the cell surface density of integrin molecules. These results suggest a model in which collagen density induces a qualitative transition in the fundamental way that fibroblasts interact with the substrate. At low density, the availability of collagen binding sites is limiting and the cells simply try to flatten as much as possible by pulling on the few available sites as hard as they can. The force per bond under these conditions approaches 100 pN, approximately equal to the force required for rupture of integrin-peptide bonds. In contrast, at high collagen density adhesion, traction force and motility are limited by the availability of free integrins on the cell surface since so many of these receptors are bound to the surface ligand and the force per bond is very low.

A Hybrid Model Describing Different Morphologies of Tumor Invasion Fronts

“…In particular, it can be reproduced in vitro by adding saturating amounts of matrix components, that extinguish substrate inhomogeneities. At this regard, experimental evidence have demonstrated that, consistently with our results, cells cultured in matrices with high collagen densities show a dramatic downregulation of their migratory capacity, driven by the fact that their integrin receptors are completely engaged without maximal cell spreading and movement [20,22]. An analogous behavior is seen by varying the cell proteolytic activity, measured by the parameter χ p , see Fig.…”

Growth substrate induced functional changes elucidated by FTIR and Raman spectroscopy in in–vitro cultured human keratinocytes

“…Recently it has been demonstrated in the literature that these effects can be expressed in the cell at the level of genomic regulation, thus contributing to very fundamental changes in cellular physiology, ultimately resulting in unknown adjustments to cellular proliferation, motility and, in some cases, phenotype [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In this work we have demonstrated that measurements of cellular proliferation and viability on coated spectroscopic substrates can be correlated with spectral changes induced by adjustments to cell physiology when cultured on the different coatings.…”

“…Noninvasive spectroscopic measurements of cellular function in in-vitro cultured cell lines require substrates such as quartz, ZnSe and MirrIR (Ag/SnO 2 coated glass for FTIRM from Kevley Technologies) etc. It has been demonstrated that surfaces and scaffolds for cell culture can induce changes in cellular adhesion and motility [17,18], in their proliferation and differentiation [16,19], and in gene expression [20], ultimately influencing the fate of the cell [21]. Much of the interaction of adherent cells with their culture substrates is dependent on the surface chemistry [18,22] and surface energy [23].…”

A cellular Potts model analyzing differentiated cell behavior during in vivo vascularization of a hypoxic tissue

“…Cell migratory ability can be also determined by the absolute concentrations of ECM components: this mechanism is called haptokinesis. At this regard, several experimental studies show that cell speed, spreading, and membrane activity is maximal at intermediate levels of ECM densities, both on 2D substrates [14,19] and in 3D matrices [73]. Also the local rigidity of the matrix plays a fundamental role in determining the efficiency and the direction of cell crawling, e.g.…”