2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2008.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of triphenylphosphine on the activity of heterogeneous iridium, rhodium and platinum containing catalysts for the dehydrogenation of saturated hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 Despite the fact that triphenylphosphine is one of the most commonly employed ligands in homogeneous catalysis, 43 reports of its use in heterogeneous systems are rare 44 beyond cases where it forms part of an anchored complex. [45][46][47] In this paper we report characterisation of triphenylphosphine modified Pd/TiO 2 as well as evaluation of catalytic performance at atmospheric pressure (as commonly reported in the academic literature). In addition, catalyst performance and stability under high pressure conditions (as applied in industry) is investigated for longer periods on stream than previously reported, and in the absence of CO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Despite the fact that triphenylphosphine is one of the most commonly employed ligands in homogeneous catalysis, 43 reports of its use in heterogeneous systems are rare 44 beyond cases where it forms part of an anchored complex. [45][46][47] In this paper we report characterisation of triphenylphosphine modified Pd/TiO 2 as well as evaluation of catalytic performance at atmospheric pressure (as commonly reported in the academic literature). In addition, catalyst performance and stability under high pressure conditions (as applied in industry) is investigated for longer periods on stream than previously reported, and in the absence of CO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8] A common approach, as opposed to generating complexes on the surface of the support used, has been to support or immobilize organometallic complexes on high surface area inorganic supports. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] These strategies frequently work, but only in a narrow range of operating conditions, usually at low temperature, outside of which ligand loss contributes to particle agglomeration and at which point the unique benefits of the ligand field such as enhanced selectivity and active site uniformity are also lost. 10,20,23 CHARACTERIZATION ACTIVITY SELECTIVITY HANDLING HETEROGENEOUS X X HOMOGENEOUS X X TETHERED X X X X…”
Section: Tethered Complex Metal-bound Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously shown that the dehydrogenation activities of various, seemingly unrelated, iridium catalysts toward dehydrogenation at temperatures above 300 °C are strongly correlated to the number of equivalents of tertiary phosphine present in the system, whether loaded initially or pulsed while on stream. [54][55][56] This was in spite of the fact that the phosphine ligands and/or additives used were observed to decompose, and even though these past experiments were performed in open, continuousflow systems which would allow for volatile phosphorus products to be removed from the catalyst bed. 54,55 This is consistent with the phosphorus becoming "trapped" on the surface in an iridium phosphide phase, much like the one observed in this work.…”
Section: 50mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[54][55][56] This was in spite of the fact that the phosphine ligands and/or additives used were observed to decompose, and even though these past experiments were performed in open, continuousflow systems which would allow for volatile phosphorus products to be removed from the catalyst bed. 54,55 This is consistent with the phosphorus becoming "trapped" on the surface in an iridium phosphide phase, much like the one observed in this work. The serendipitous precatalyst deconstruction observed here resulted in nanoparticles with an average size of 0.8 -0.9 nm in diameter that proved to be stable against agglomeration at temperatures up to 440 °C, even under non-oxidative dehydrogenation conditions.…”
Section: 50mentioning
confidence: 99%