2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of tree plantations on the phylogenetic structure of understorey plant communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(77 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, effects of H. rhamnoides on co‐occurring species seem to be more pronounced in an oceanic climate in coastal dune ecosystems (Isermann et al., ) than in Transylvania's more continental climate. Although we cannot fully exclude the competitive effects of the non‐native H. rhamnoides on plant community and seed bank composition, our findings outline the higher relative importance of the general encroachment of woody species on the composition of plant community and seed bank compared to specific effects of the non‐native H. rhamnoides (see also Piwczyński, Puchałka, & Ulrich, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Accordingly, effects of H. rhamnoides on co‐occurring species seem to be more pronounced in an oceanic climate in coastal dune ecosystems (Isermann et al., ) than in Transylvania's more continental climate. Although we cannot fully exclude the competitive effects of the non‐native H. rhamnoides on plant community and seed bank composition, our findings outline the higher relative importance of the general encroachment of woody species on the composition of plant community and seed bank compared to specific effects of the non‐native H. rhamnoides (see also Piwczyński, Puchałka, & Ulrich, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The results of these previous studies have been far from universal and unified. In addition, a previous study demonstrated that plantation changed the community structures of understory compared with natural forests (Piwczyński, Puchałka & Ulrich, 2016). However, it remains unclear how thinning practices actually affect understory community structures and distribution patterns in plantation forest ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of an important forest tree, Q. petraea, was instead found to increase the species-level evolutionary relatedness in the understorey, suggesting species identity to be more important than species richness. This is not in line with evidence from non-native tree plantations in central Europe, where species identity did not affect the understorey phylogenetic structure (Piwczyński et al 2016). Hence, further studies on wider geographic and environmental scales are needed to better understand the relationship between overstorey and understorey from an evolutionary standpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The Net Relatedness Index (NRI) and the Nearest Taxon Index (NTI) were used to quantify the degree of community weighted phylogenetic relatedness among species within each forest plot. Both indices are measures of phylogenetic divergence (Tucker et al 2016) successfully used for the assessment of sustainability and health of forest ecosystems (Potter and Koch 2014) or for the impact of forest plantations on understorey phylogenetic structure (Piwczyński et al 2016). NRI measures the standardized effect size of the mean phylogenetic distance (MPD), which estimates the average phylogenetic relatedness between all possible pairs of taxa in an assemblage; this index is dominated by the deep phylogenetic relationships between taxa since its calculation considers all pairwise distances within the community (Webb 2000;Stadler et al 2017).…”
Section: Indices Of Phylogenetic Diversity and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%